Buckmark
I have had a 22/45 for more than 15 years and easily put more than 4,000 rounds through it. It is extremely reliable. Even using cheap ammo it always works. The only problem I ever had was the front sight getting a bit loose, but that is easy to fix with a little lock tite, and that was after 3,000 rounds.
I highly reccommend it.
I highly reccommend it.
I think the 22/45 is a very good suppressed platform. Probably ever so slightly quieter than the same can on a Buckmark, but I prefer the Buckmark for it's ease of cleaning & maintenance, inexpensive parts, easily changed barrels (no serial # on the upper like the Ruger), etc.
I've had 2 22/45's and keep selling them. They are good guns, reliable, accurate, but they are a pain to field strip and you can't readily swap barrels like you can on the Buckmark. That's what I plan to get next time.
I don't strip mine down. Been there done that. A can of carbon cleaner is your friend, along with an old toothbrush. Granted you have to clean the bore from the front, but thats easy as well, or use a bore snake.
The magazine floor plate on the 22/45 looks a little cheezy to me but I like the grip angle much better than on the metal frame Ruger. The new 22/45 that has checkered wood grips looks MUCH better than the all plastic frame gun, but I still prefer a Buckmark, but next .22 will probably be a CZ Kadet and I will later get a .40 cal conversion kit.
you can get them with a threaded barrel? from a regular distributor?
I have found a company that has threaded MK3's for $319, so it made more sense to me that to buy a p22 or mosquito. Never have owned the buckmark, but they are dead sexy, and if I can find one in that money would definately consider that.
Similar threads
- Sub Category: Handguns
- Sale Price: 425$
- Caliber: 22 lr
