Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Ruger Mk III vs Ruger Mk IV
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="druryj" data-source="post: 2951947" data-attributes="member: 10465"><p>To me it is. I got my Blued Mk IV Target for $419 (plus tax of course) at Big Boys Guns and Range. I had a MK III for several years, and know how to reassemble it after much cussin' and fretting but I <em>finally</em> figured it out. The MK III is a great pistol, but the MK IV did away with the loaded chamber indicator, which I for one did not like, as well as the super easy takedown. You can put a Majestic Arms Speed Strip kit in a MK III for about $50 or $60 bucks though. If you come to the ENS next Sunday, you can shoot my MK IV and see how it takes down and goes back together. I think they did a fantastic job on the MK IV finish as well; it's a very sharp looking gun. It really boils down to personal preference. Either will outlast us and our kids and hopefully end up in he grandkid's hands someday.</p><p></p><p>Now, if I had to choose between a MK III Hunter, or a MK IV target for roughly the same price? Then it gets harder to decide. For a plinker and casual use, the MK IV Target Model is ideal, for me. The MK III Hunter is a hell of a .22 though. Only you can decide.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="druryj, post: 2951947, member: 10465"] To me it is. I got my Blued Mk IV Target for $419 (plus tax of course) at Big Boys Guns and Range. I had a MK III for several years, and know how to reassemble it after much cussin' and fretting but I [I]finally[/I] figured it out. The MK III is a great pistol, but the MK IV did away with the loaded chamber indicator, which I for one did not like, as well as the super easy takedown. You can put a Majestic Arms Speed Strip kit in a MK III for about $50 or $60 bucks though. If you come to the ENS next Sunday, you can shoot my MK IV and see how it takes down and goes back together. I think they did a fantastic job on the MK IV finish as well; it's a very sharp looking gun. It really boils down to personal preference. Either will outlast us and our kids and hopefully end up in he grandkid's hands someday. Now, if I had to choose between a MK III Hunter, or a MK IV target for roughly the same price? Then it gets harder to decide. For a plinker and casual use, the MK IV Target Model is ideal, for me. The MK III Hunter is a hell of a .22 though. Only you can decide. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Ruger Mk III vs Ruger Mk IV
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom