Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
S&W 686 or Ruger GP100 - opinions
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nraman" data-source="post: 1119938" data-attributes="member: 10001"><p>I agree with you 100%. The investment castings Ruger uses are not the stronger alloy, simply what fits the production system. They've had a few cracked receivers on some guns.</p><p>I heard of people shoot many thousands of heavy .357M in L frames with no ill effects. I can't say the same for a K frame .357 I had once (M-19) The L was designed for heavy use and from what I hear on the S&W forums it can take it.</p><p>It is better looking than the Ruger IMHO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nraman, post: 1119938, member: 10001"] I agree with you 100%. The investment castings Ruger uses are not the stronger alloy, simply what fits the production system. They've had a few cracked receivers on some guns. I heard of people shoot many thousands of heavy .357M in L frames with no ill effects. I can't say the same for a K frame .357 I had once (M-19) The L was designed for heavy use and from what I hear on the S&W forums it can take it. It is better looking than the Ruger IMHO. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
S&W 686 or Ruger GP100 - opinions
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom