Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
S&W questions
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Junior Bonner" data-source="post: 2968892" data-attributes="member: 33416"><p>What led down this road inadvertently was the question I had pertaining to the 64; was it an M&P? The two other Smith and Wessons I have are featured here, and are M&Ps. But oddly, and I may never get to the bottom of this - the 64 is not an M&P. It's twin, the Model 10 used to be, but was redesignated in the late 1950s. Hickock45 says it happened in 1957, but Cirillo said 1959.</p><p></p><p>Edit: I drifted wayyyyy off track, I guess. My bad, lol!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Junior Bonner, post: 2968892, member: 33416"] What led down this road inadvertently was the question I had pertaining to the 64; was it an M&P? The two other Smith and Wessons I have are featured here, and are M&Ps. But oddly, and I may never get to the bottom of this - the 64 is not an M&P. It's twin, the Model 10 used to be, but was redesignated in the late 1950s. Hickock45 says it happened in 1957, but Cirillo said 1959. Edit: I drifted wayyyyy off track, I guess. My bad, lol! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
S&W questions
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom