Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
SA/DA VS Striker/SA
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jhat" data-source="post: 2828855" data-attributes="member: 11866"><p>I love 1911's and own some nice ones. Wilson, Baer, and Brown. Although I have carried 1911's it gets expensive testing them for reliability. They tend to be magazine/ammo picky. For the last three years I have been carrying .45 XDM's and .45 Glock 21's. They are not magazine pickey and eat any quality ammo. Now to OP's question. Striker pistols are more dangerous to carry because of no manual safety. Shove one into a holster with part of your shirt inside the trigger guard and you go bang. Many law enforcement officers, and others, have found out the hard way. I recently acquired a Wilson Combat Brig Tac Beretta with the action tune. 8 pound double action pull and 3.75 single action pull. Decocker only with a heavier G slide. It's like carrying a tuned revolver and the match barrel makes it very accurate. I have the added safety of a revolver with the fire power of a semi. The Beretta runs like a well oiled sewing machine and is as reliable as a striker. All metal parts including a fluted guide rod. I love this pistol and the price is right. Check it out.</p><p><a href="http://shopwilsoncombat.com/Beretta-_-Wilson-Combat-92G-Brigadier-Tactical-9mm/productinfo/BER-92BRIG-9/" target="_blank">http://shopwilsoncombat.com/Beretta-_-Wilson-Combat-92G-Brigadier-Tactical-9mm/productinfo/BER-92BRIG-9/</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jhat, post: 2828855, member: 11866"] I love 1911's and own some nice ones. Wilson, Baer, and Brown. Although I have carried 1911's it gets expensive testing them for reliability. They tend to be magazine/ammo picky. For the last three years I have been carrying .45 XDM's and .45 Glock 21's. They are not magazine pickey and eat any quality ammo. Now to OP's question. Striker pistols are more dangerous to carry because of no manual safety. Shove one into a holster with part of your shirt inside the trigger guard and you go bang. Many law enforcement officers, and others, have found out the hard way. I recently acquired a Wilson Combat Brig Tac Beretta with the action tune. 8 pound double action pull and 3.75 single action pull. Decocker only with a heavier G slide. It's like carrying a tuned revolver and the match barrel makes it very accurate. I have the added safety of a revolver with the fire power of a semi. The Beretta runs like a well oiled sewing machine and is as reliable as a striker. All metal parts including a fluted guide rod. I love this pistol and the price is right. Check it out. [url]http://shopwilsoncombat.com/Beretta-_-Wilson-Combat-92G-Brigadier-Tactical-9mm/productinfo/BER-92BRIG-9/[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
SA/DA VS Striker/SA
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom