Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
San Fran's last gun shop regulated/PC'd out of existence
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mugsy" data-source="post: 2796474" data-attributes="member: 18914"><p>You know somehow other medical providers and ambulatory clinics managed to stay open - I think that abortion clinics could have managed to do so as well even if needing to meet the same standard as other ambulatory clinics (not higher standards) and requiring admitting priviliges to nearby hospitals. I will research if admitting priviliges are required for other ambulatory clinics. In reality, abortion clinics were operating under an exemption from a general rule and are not being made subject to a new onerous rule unknown among other medical service providers. I also have a hard time understanding the logic of not wanting to be held to those standards since a baseline argument from pro-abortion service politicians and providers is to prevent those those terrible unsanitary unregulated back-room abortions of yesteryear.</p><p></p><p>In the case of SF - if one is talking about, for example, just a regular minimum wage increases well that affects everyone and it may hurt business across the board but it isn't aimed at a particular business -- in this case one individual business. How many other businesses are required to videotape their customers at the city of SF's behest?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mugsy, post: 2796474, member: 18914"] You know somehow other medical providers and ambulatory clinics managed to stay open - I think that abortion clinics could have managed to do so as well even if needing to meet the same standard as other ambulatory clinics (not higher standards) and requiring admitting priviliges to nearby hospitals. I will research if admitting priviliges are required for other ambulatory clinics. In reality, abortion clinics were operating under an exemption from a general rule and are not being made subject to a new onerous rule unknown among other medical service providers. I also have a hard time understanding the logic of not wanting to be held to those standards since a baseline argument from pro-abortion service politicians and providers is to prevent those those terrible unsanitary unregulated back-room abortions of yesteryear. In the case of SF - if one is talking about, for example, just a regular minimum wage increases well that affects everyone and it may hurt business across the board but it isn't aimed at a particular business -- in this case one individual business. How many other businesses are required to videotape their customers at the city of SF's behest? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
San Fran's last gun shop regulated/PC'd out of existence
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom