Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
San Fran's last gun shop regulated/PC'd out of existence
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ace_on_the_Turn" data-source="post: 2796493" data-attributes="member: 27417"><p>And you would be wrong. Abortions are so safe and complications requiring hospitalization so rare that doctors that perform abortions are unable to acquire and keep admitting privileges because they never need to admit a patient. The law (in Texas) was not passed for any reason other than trying to prevent women from being able to avail themselves of a legal, Constitutionally protected, procedure. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Abortion providers are held to the same level of care as any other medical provider. Again, the law that was passed in Texas would have required abortion providers to have the same equipment and facilities standards of outpatient surgical centers. Many surgical procedures are performed every day in medical offices that are not considered surgical centers that are much more invasive and complicated than an abortion. And they do not have to have admitting-privileges nor have the same equipment and facilities standards of outpatient surgical centers. The wave of anti-abortion laws have nothing, not a damn thing, to do with anything other than trying to restrict or eliminate a woman's right to have an abortion. If you can't admit that simply fact you are either lying or ignorant of the facts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ace_on_the_Turn, post: 2796493, member: 27417"] And you would be wrong. Abortions are so safe and complications requiring hospitalization so rare that doctors that perform abortions are unable to acquire and keep admitting privileges because they never need to admit a patient. The law (in Texas) was not passed for any reason other than trying to prevent women from being able to avail themselves of a legal, Constitutionally protected, procedure. Abortion providers are held to the same level of care as any other medical provider. Again, the law that was passed in Texas would have required abortion providers to have the same equipment and facilities standards of outpatient surgical centers. Many surgical procedures are performed every day in medical offices that are not considered surgical centers that are much more invasive and complicated than an abortion. And they do not have to have admitting-privileges nor have the same equipment and facilities standards of outpatient surgical centers. The wave of anti-abortion laws have nothing, not a damn thing, to do with anything other than trying to restrict or eliminate a woman's right to have an abortion. If you can't admit that simply fact you are either lying or ignorant of the facts. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
San Fran's last gun shop regulated/PC'd out of existence
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom