Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Shooting at Penn Square Mall OKC
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aries" data-source="post: 3306541" data-attributes="member: 44328"><p>The presence of a sign does not in itself make it illegal. To put it another way, if he can legally carry in Atwoods with no sign, he can legally carry in Target with a sign. The business owner can ask him to leave, if he refuses at that point he is subject to a fine.</p><p></p><p>I was looking at HB2597, apparently not the final version, but this is a link to current law</p><p></p><p><a href="https://osbi.ok.gov/sites/g/files/gmc476/f/documents/2019_SDA_Law_Book-_FINAL_09172019_with_COVER.pdf" target="_blank">https://osbi.ok.gov/sites/g/files/gmc476/f/documents/2019_SDA_Law_Book-_FINAL_09172019_with_COVER.pdf</a></p><p></p><p>1290.22 is the section on rights of business owners, but chuter posted the relevant part above. What in that is violated simply by possessing a gun where no gun signs are posted? It simply says the business owner can deny you access, and you must leave.</p><p></p><p>That is not to say that he won't be charged with other crimes (possession by a convicted felon, brandishing, attempted murder, etc.) I expect he will. But the purpose of the conversation seems to be if YOU are caught in the mall with a legally possessed firearm, can you be prosecuted? My question is, what in the SDA lawbook says you have violated any law?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aries, post: 3306541, member: 44328"] The presence of a sign does not in itself make it illegal. To put it another way, if he can legally carry in Atwoods with no sign, he can legally carry in Target with a sign. The business owner can ask him to leave, if he refuses at that point he is subject to a fine. I was looking at HB2597, apparently not the final version, but this is a link to current law [URL]https://osbi.ok.gov/sites/g/files/gmc476/f/documents/2019_SDA_Law_Book-_FINAL_09172019_with_COVER.pdf[/URL] 1290.22 is the section on rights of business owners, but chuter posted the relevant part above. What in that is violated simply by possessing a gun where no gun signs are posted? It simply says the business owner can deny you access, and you must leave. That is not to say that he won't be charged with other crimes (possession by a convicted felon, brandishing, attempted murder, etc.) I expect he will. But the purpose of the conversation seems to be if YOU are caught in the mall with a legally possessed firearm, can you be prosecuted? My question is, what in the SDA lawbook says you have violated any law? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Shooting at Penn Square Mall OKC
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom