Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Shooting backstop
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tRidiot" data-source="post: 3228523" data-attributes="member: 9374"><p>I get where you're coming from, but I DO agree what [USER=11634]@carter[/USER] is advocating IS an infringement on our rights. Absolutely, unequivocally and without remorse. He flat out says if he were the neighbor he would be raising hell to prevent Tony from doing this - which is totally legal and within his rights, and in MY opinion has been undertaken with a fair amount of care, caution and concern for both safety and inconvenience to others. He is saying Tony should spend probably THOUSANDS of dollars to build a MUCH more complicated and intrusive range or NOT BE ALLOWED to shoot on his own property - in a manner allowed by state law and approved by his local law enforcement, let's not forget - or be FORCED to go to a range which meets the NRA's recommendations. How is this NOT advocating an infringement on someone's rights? Just because he has what I think is an irrational fear of someone shooting AWAY from his home?</p><p></p><p>Eff that, man. </p><p></p><p>Don't get it twisted... I'm not pissed off, I'm not yelling, I'm forcefully and definitively defending my position, but I'm in no way mad or upset about what is essentially a civil discussion - I just think what's being asked and/or suggested is absolutely LUDICROUS to ask someone to do on his own property. Period.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tRidiot, post: 3228523, member: 9374"] I get where you're coming from, but I DO agree what [USER=11634]@carter[/USER] is advocating IS an infringement on our rights. Absolutely, unequivocally and without remorse. He flat out says if he were the neighbor he would be raising hell to prevent Tony from doing this - which is totally legal and within his rights, and in MY opinion has been undertaken with a fair amount of care, caution and concern for both safety and inconvenience to others. He is saying Tony should spend probably THOUSANDS of dollars to build a MUCH more complicated and intrusive range or NOT BE ALLOWED to shoot on his own property - in a manner allowed by state law and approved by his local law enforcement, let's not forget - or be FORCED to go to a range which meets the NRA's recommendations. How is this NOT advocating an infringement on someone's rights? Just because he has what I think is an irrational fear of someone shooting AWAY from his home? Eff that, man. Don't get it twisted... I'm not pissed off, I'm not yelling, I'm forcefully and definitively defending my position, but I'm in no way mad or upset about what is essentially a civil discussion - I just think what's being asked and/or suggested is absolutely LUDICROUS to ask someone to do on his own property. Period. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Shooting backstop
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom