Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
sig p239???
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ez bake" data-source="post: 1081172" data-attributes="member: 229"><p>I had one and loved it (mine was a P239 SAS). Here's a comparison of it vs. the Kahr K9 I used to own (I had... just a bit of work done to the Kahr):</p><p></p><p><a href="http://okshooters.com/forums/showthread.php?t=65494" target="_blank">http://okshooters.com/forums/showthread.php?t=65494</a></p><p></p><p>I ended up selling it mostly because I found a German Sig P228 that I couldn't live without. </p><p></p><p>Honestly, I've owned a P6 (German Police version of the P225) and the P239 and they were both just to large (wide long and tall) to only house 8 rounds. </p><p></p><p>I will say that after owning a Kahr and then going to the Sig, the mags in the Sig are much better made (heavier steel, better construction), and the fit/finish on the Sig is unmatched.</p><p></p><p>That being said, the same is true of other Sigs and my P228 is barely larger than the P239 I had, so I didn't loose much in the way of "concealability" and yet I gained 13rds in a factory mag, or 15 in a Mec-Gar aftermarket.</p><p></p><p>I've started leaning more towards the "J-frame in the pocket" over any smaller semi-autos and just carrying a compact or mid-sized semi-auto IWB and forgetting about the sub-compacts.</p><p></p><p>I want to say that Talacker still has my old Sig P239 SAS (which was his old P239 SAS). Last I checked, he was looking to sell it again to fund something else. You might PM him about selling his (if he still has it).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ez bake, post: 1081172, member: 229"] I had one and loved it (mine was a P239 SAS). Here's a comparison of it vs. the Kahr K9 I used to own (I had... just a bit of work done to the Kahr): [url]http://okshooters.com/forums/showthread.php?t=65494[/url] I ended up selling it mostly because I found a German Sig P228 that I couldn't live without. Honestly, I've owned a P6 (German Police version of the P225) and the P239 and they were both just to large (wide long and tall) to only house 8 rounds. I will say that after owning a Kahr and then going to the Sig, the mags in the Sig are much better made (heavier steel, better construction), and the fit/finish on the Sig is unmatched. That being said, the same is true of other Sigs and my P228 is barely larger than the P239 I had, so I didn't loose much in the way of "concealability" and yet I gained 13rds in a factory mag, or 15 in a Mec-Gar aftermarket. I've started leaning more towards the "J-frame in the pocket" over any smaller semi-autos and just carrying a compact or mid-sized semi-auto IWB and forgetting about the sub-compacts. I want to say that Talacker still has my old Sig P239 SAS (which was his old P239 SAS). Last I checked, he was looking to sell it again to fund something else. You might PM him about selling his (if he still has it). [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
sig p239???
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom