Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Silly ATF Pistol Scorecard Question
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Finnished" data-source="post: 3875014" data-attributes="member: 46577"><p>Makes sense as much as it can make sense. The language on the form does not say that. It simply says "indicating two handed fire". By saying its a handguard, that implies your hand would be there. But for it to be there, you'd also have a hand on the pistol grip. I'm following what you're saying, but given the ATF track record on saying one thing and doubling back, it seems vague enough to become a gotcha for some unlucky winner of an ATF visit</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Finnished, post: 3875014, member: 46577"] Makes sense as much as it can make sense. The language on the form does not say that. It simply says "indicating two handed fire". By saying its a handguard, that implies your hand would be there. But for it to be there, you'd also have a hand on the pistol grip. I'm following what you're saying, but given the ATF track record on saying one thing and doubling back, it seems vague enough to become a gotcha for some unlucky winner of an ATF visit [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Silly ATF Pistol Scorecard Question
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom