Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Military Surplus
SKS and Detachable Magazines
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Singularis" data-source="post: 2496596" data-attributes="member: 32412"><p>If it were me I'd leave it factory... regular old 10 round clips work great in them, and maintain the rifle's excellent reliability. </p><p></p><p>But on the subject of 922(r)... you know it doesn't penalize the <em>possession </em>of a gun in "illicit" configuration, right? Only the <em>manufacture</em> of one. In other words, in the extremely long shot chance that a Federal agent got a look at the innards of your Simonov and decided to prosecute you under that section, in order to pin it on you they would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you were the one who put it in that configuration. Also, they would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the country of origin of the parts... neither is an easy row to hoe. It is probably for this reason that the section goes almost completely unprosecuted, except in the case of charge-stacking along with other, more easily-proved charges like illegal transfers and whatnot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Singularis, post: 2496596, member: 32412"] If it were me I'd leave it factory... regular old 10 round clips work great in them, and maintain the rifle's excellent reliability. But on the subject of 922(r)... you know it doesn't penalize the [I]possession [/I]of a gun in "illicit" configuration, right? Only the [I]manufacture[/I] of one. In other words, in the extremely long shot chance that a Federal agent got a look at the innards of your Simonov and decided to prosecute you under that section, in order to pin it on you they would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you were the one who put it in that configuration. Also, they would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the country of origin of the parts... neither is an easy row to hoe. It is probably for this reason that the section goes almost completely unprosecuted, except in the case of charge-stacking along with other, more easily-proved charges like illegal transfers and whatnot. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Military Surplus
SKS and Detachable Magazines
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom