Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Stanford Scientist Says Man "Has No Free Will" ...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rhart" data-source="post: 4141678" data-attributes="member: 16596"><p>"...it is a mistake to equate science with reductionism. Science does not force us to think of humans as nothing more than heaps of interacting particles. To the contrary, in the sciences of human behavior—from anthropology and psychology to economics and sociology—it is standard practice to think of people as intentional agents with a capacity for making choices and responding intelligently to their environments." Boston Review</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/christian-list-has-science-refuted-free-will/#:~:text=has%20moved%20on.-,Science%20has%20not%20refuted%20free%20will%2C%20after%20all.,than%20heaps%20of%20interacting%20particles.[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rhart, post: 4141678, member: 16596"] "...it is a mistake to equate science with reductionism. Science does not force us to think of humans as nothing more than heaps of interacting particles. To the contrary, in the sciences of human behavior—from anthropology and psychology to economics and sociology—it is standard practice to think of people as intentional agents with a capacity for making choices and responding intelligently to their environments." Boston Review [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/christian-list-has-science-refuted-free-will/#:~:text=has%20moved%20on.-,Science%20has%20not%20refuted%20free%20will%2C%20after%20all.,than%20heaps%20of%20interacting%20particles.[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Stanford Scientist Says Man "Has No Free Will" ...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom