Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The balloon is going up over Atlanta now.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ignerntbend" data-source="post: 3378002" data-attributes="member: 6981"><p>Yes. If a guy is running from you, and he’s forty feet away, and he has a tazer which can incapacitate you, and he turns to threaten you momentarily and turns again to run away, should you be allowed to shoot him in the back? I think the shoot meets the reasonable officer standard as laid down by the Renquist Court.</p><p>It’s the responsibility of the police to be scared shitless all the time because they’re in a war zone.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ignerntbend, post: 3378002, member: 6981"] Yes. If a guy is running from you, and he’s forty feet away, and he has a tazer which can incapacitate you, and he turns to threaten you momentarily and turns again to run away, should you be allowed to shoot him in the back? I think the shoot meets the reasonable officer standard as laid down by the Renquist Court. It’s the responsibility of the police to be scared shitless all the time because they’re in a war zone. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The balloon is going up over Atlanta now.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom