Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The Feds vs Cliven Bundy
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 2477844" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>Toward the bottom of his homepage, talking about an adjoining Utah county;</p><p></p><p>The listing of the tortoise--especially with the bolded part--resulting in the condemnation or dimunition in value of the land can certainly constitute a regulatory taking, as can the restriction of rights previously enjoyed.</p><p></p><p>I still think he's probably wrong, but it's more like a 95% chance instead of 100% crazy. There might just be something there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 2477844, member: 13624"] Toward the bottom of his homepage, talking about an adjoining Utah county; The listing of the tortoise--especially with the bolded part--resulting in the condemnation or dimunition in value of the land can certainly constitute a regulatory taking, as can the restriction of rights previously enjoyed. I still think he's probably wrong, but it's more like a 95% chance instead of 100% crazy. There might just be something there. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The Feds vs Cliven Bundy
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom