Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The Invasion
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 4212261" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>Interesting train of thought. I lean more toward their lack of education and being a disarmed populace unable or unwilling to rid themselves of a despotic dictatorial government.</p><p></p><p>When you can't fight, one will likely take flight. Once those people see a better way of life, even as the lowest of the low, any uptick in their life style is all the attraction they need to flee their current situation. Better they should revolt against their oppressors and institute a republican form of government similar to ours and reap the benefits they earn for themselves and not for the benefit of their current oppressors.</p><p></p><p>Seal the border and they'll either have to accept their chains or rise up and rid themselves of their masters. </p><p></p><p>Sealed borders will also stem the flow of our enemies who are already in numbers large enough to form fifth columns.</p><p></p><p>No new law is required. Just enforce those we have on the books. This new law being proposed by Lankford and his ilk is just a way to reset the law to legalize a flow of what are now illegals. It's a bad law to begin with, and in time will be ignored just like the laws currently on the books. If those in government won't enforce the current laws, where is the proof that they will abide any new laws?</p><p></p><p>Close the borders - all of them including our ports and shoreline. Let no one enter who can not be of benefit to us and will not be any kind of burden. Period.</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 4212261, member: 745"] Interesting train of thought. I lean more toward their lack of education and being a disarmed populace unable or unwilling to rid themselves of a despotic dictatorial government. When you can't fight, one will likely take flight. Once those people see a better way of life, even as the lowest of the low, any uptick in their life style is all the attraction they need to flee their current situation. Better they should revolt against their oppressors and institute a republican form of government similar to ours and reap the benefits they earn for themselves and not for the benefit of their current oppressors. Seal the border and they'll either have to accept their chains or rise up and rid themselves of their masters. Sealed borders will also stem the flow of our enemies who are already in numbers large enough to form fifth columns. No new law is required. Just enforce those we have on the books. This new law being proposed by Lankford and his ilk is just a way to reset the law to legalize a flow of what are now illegals. It's a bad law to begin with, and in time will be ignored just like the laws currently on the books. If those in government won't enforce the current laws, where is the proof that they will abide any new laws? Close the borders - all of them including our ports and shoreline. Let no one enter who can not be of benefit to us and will not be any kind of burden. Period. Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The Invasion
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom