Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Tinfoil Hatters - was Sandy Hook a Hoax?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SMS" data-source="post: 2384922" data-attributes="member: 42"><p>This is a perfect example of someone, like whoever wrote the article in the OP, taking a snippet of information and spinning it into something "odd" in order to convince the reader.</p><p></p><p>The photo method of identification was used <em>in the immediate aftermath</em> of the shooting as a way to take accountability of everyone who was in the school, or should have been in the school, without contaminating the crime scene and parading parents through the carnage. In other words, Who is missing? Who should be here but isn't? Who is here but shouldn't be?</p><p></p><p>After the dust settled, every parent was able to indentify and claim the remains of their children, in person....but we won't bring that part up because it doesn't fit the narrative of the conspiracy theory.</p><p></p><p>Maybe they should've line up the parents, issued them rubber gloves, cute little shoe covers like you saw on CSI Miami, and let them wander through the school to sort through the mess by themselves?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SMS, post: 2384922, member: 42"] This is a perfect example of someone, like whoever wrote the article in the OP, taking a snippet of information and spinning it into something "odd" in order to convince the reader. The photo method of identification was used [I]in the immediate aftermath[/I] of the shooting as a way to take accountability of everyone who was in the school, or should have been in the school, without contaminating the crime scene and parading parents through the carnage. In other words, Who is missing? Who should be here but isn't? Who is here but shouldn't be? After the dust settled, every parent was able to indentify and claim the remains of their children, in person....but we won't bring that part up because it doesn't fit the narrative of the conspiracy theory. Maybe they should've line up the parents, issued them rubber gloves, cute little shoe covers like you saw on CSI Miami, and let them wander through the school to sort through the mess by themselves? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Tinfoil Hatters - was Sandy Hook a Hoax?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom