Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
Torn between which .22 to get.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ez bake" data-source="post: 842173" data-attributes="member: 229"><p>Both guns (in modern-day form) have tons of cheaply cast parts as well as a multitude of plastic in places where aluminum or steel used to be. They're both good guns though, but neither is the epitome of quality. </p><p></p><p>A CZ 452 would be a much better rifle if you were willing to go for a Bolt-action, but for fun-factor, its hard to beat a 10/22 or a Henry lever.</p><p></p><p>The Henry's action is smooth as glass and its just a fun rifle. In my opinion, I wouldn't put a scope on one (I didn't put one on the .22mag Henry I had). You can put almost as many goodies on a Henry as you can a Ruger, they just go in the Cowboy category and not the tacti-cool category. They make several different parts/mods for the Henry including a large-loop, different sights, a metal barrel-band, leather stock-packs and fancy leather saddle-holsters, etc...</p><p></p><p>A plus for this rifle is that it will not jam the way a semi-auto rifle will (yes, the Rugers are somewhat picky about ammo - you can't run the cheapest stuff through them all day without a hiccup - and if it hiccups, you often have to take a little time to clear the jam). With the Henry, just cycle the lever and keep shooting.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Rugers are fun too - and if you want to spend some money on an addiction, a 10/22 is a good place to start. I've got two and can't complain about them a bit. They're pretty reliable for a semi-auto if you keep them clean.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ez bake, post: 842173, member: 229"] Both guns (in modern-day form) have tons of cheaply cast parts as well as a multitude of plastic in places where aluminum or steel used to be. They're both good guns though, but neither is the epitome of quality. A CZ 452 would be a much better rifle if you were willing to go for a Bolt-action, but for fun-factor, its hard to beat a 10/22 or a Henry lever. The Henry's action is smooth as glass and its just a fun rifle. In my opinion, I wouldn't put a scope on one (I didn't put one on the .22mag Henry I had). You can put almost as many goodies on a Henry as you can a Ruger, they just go in the Cowboy category and not the tacti-cool category. They make several different parts/mods for the Henry including a large-loop, different sights, a metal barrel-band, leather stock-packs and fancy leather saddle-holsters, etc... A plus for this rifle is that it will not jam the way a semi-auto rifle will (yes, the Rugers are somewhat picky about ammo - you can't run the cheapest stuff through them all day without a hiccup - and if it hiccups, you often have to take a little time to clear the jam). With the Henry, just cycle the lever and keep shooting. Rugers are fun too - and if you want to spend some money on an addiction, a 10/22 is a good place to start. I've got two and can't complain about them a bit. They're pretty reliable for a semi-auto if you keep them clean. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
Torn between which .22 to get.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom