Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Trump's 200th judge confirmed.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fredkrueger100" data-source="post: 3383442" data-attributes="member: 24577"><p>This don’t do much for me. I keep hearing about how great these folks are yet I don’t see much changing. Just like the scotus. We just had 10 cases that they refused to hear. Clarence Thomas lambasted the fellow justices too. Kavanaugh joined his opinion except for the part where Thomas said “ the 2A protects an individuals right to carry a gun in public”. That right there should show you why Kavanaugh thinks. If he believed that he would have joined that part of the opinion. I haven’t seen them do squat to make me happy. I say it all the time. The courts ain’t gonna do a darn thing to help this country. They don’t uphold the constitution and never will. I also don’t trust Trumps judgment on choosing folks. After all, he chose anti gun William Barr, he nominated anti gun chuck Canterbury to head the ATF. Look at all the others he has chosen that are part of the swamp.</p><p></p><p>I wanted trump to pick Coney-Barrett which by all accounts she is supposed to be a huge constitutionalist. But instead he chose Kavanaugh. She was supposedly a finalist for it so why is he presenting another list of several folks he might choose if he gets another chance? Why not just say he is going to pick her. Or at least wait until it happens and then pick her.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fredkrueger100, post: 3383442, member: 24577"] This don’t do much for me. I keep hearing about how great these folks are yet I don’t see much changing. Just like the scotus. We just had 10 cases that they refused to hear. Clarence Thomas lambasted the fellow justices too. Kavanaugh joined his opinion except for the part where Thomas said “ the 2A protects an individuals right to carry a gun in public”. That right there should show you why Kavanaugh thinks. If he believed that he would have joined that part of the opinion. I haven’t seen them do squat to make me happy. I say it all the time. The courts ain’t gonna do a darn thing to help this country. They don’t uphold the constitution and never will. I also don’t trust Trumps judgment on choosing folks. After all, he chose anti gun William Barr, he nominated anti gun chuck Canterbury to head the ATF. Look at all the others he has chosen that are part of the swamp. I wanted trump to pick Coney-Barrett which by all accounts she is supposed to be a huge constitutionalist. But instead he chose Kavanaugh. She was supposedly a finalist for it so why is he presenting another list of several folks he might choose if he gets another chance? Why not just say he is going to pick her. Or at least wait until it happens and then pick her. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Trump's 200th judge confirmed.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom