Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
US Special Forces Attacked CIA Server Farm In Germany In Server Seizure Operation, 5 Soldiers Killed
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="donner" data-source="post: 3471313" data-attributes="member: 277"><p>As i said, it wasn't clear if you were talking about the same incident or a different one. You didn't mention a state or anything beyond a common (and debunked) example for the trucks. Hence why i asked if you had a link because the only instances i have found give a credible explanation. I really would love to read about it. If you're will not, or cannot, provide it then okay.</p><p></p><p>And, as i noted, at least one instance of claiming fraud because of seeing a truck with out of state tags shows why pointing to the dangers of perjury for people who have given sworn statement is somewhat of a red herring. Yes, if they are proven to by lying about what they saw then they could face criminal charges. But swearing you saw something like a truck with out of state tags may not be a lie, so they aren't risking perjury. They are, however, reaching the wrong conclusions when viewed against other evidence and testimony.</p><p></p><p>So saying 'they've got hundreds of affidavits' could simply mean they have a bunch of people who are telling the truth about what they saw, yet what they saw wasn't fraud. Or, it could be. That is why these things go through the courts.</p><p></p><p>Remember, people assumed the dude with the wagon was doing something nefarious on election night, even though he wasn't.</p><p></p><p>As for the electronic stuff, well if you say my questions have been answered then it must be so. Still seems odd to not take the senate seats, or at least one, in GA. Or to not go after a state like florida, which has a history of being a swing state. You'd think if you weren't worried about the senate seats you'd pick states that wouldn't be so obvious.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps other posters will have more information to share. Do we know for sure that votes for Trump were switched to Biden, or could they have been switched to Jo? Could votes for Jo have been switched to Biden, too? Are we thinking it was code in every machine in GA, or just some? Do they all need examining? I've heard that some were connected to the internet, does that imply the others were safe? How would they know how many votes to switch with multiple people running for office and an unknown (and then still arriving) number of absentee ballots coming in to be counted?</p><p></p><p>Do anyone have a flow chart handy of how all of this fraud occurred because the methods and size of the conspiracy for each state is starting to run together and get confusing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="donner, post: 3471313, member: 277"] As i said, it wasn't clear if you were talking about the same incident or a different one. You didn't mention a state or anything beyond a common (and debunked) example for the trucks. Hence why i asked if you had a link because the only instances i have found give a credible explanation. I really would love to read about it. If you're will not, or cannot, provide it then okay. And, as i noted, at least one instance of claiming fraud because of seeing a truck with out of state tags shows why pointing to the dangers of perjury for people who have given sworn statement is somewhat of a red herring. Yes, if they are proven to by lying about what they saw then they could face criminal charges. But swearing you saw something like a truck with out of state tags may not be a lie, so they aren't risking perjury. They are, however, reaching the wrong conclusions when viewed against other evidence and testimony. So saying 'they've got hundreds of affidavits' could simply mean they have a bunch of people who are telling the truth about what they saw, yet what they saw wasn't fraud. Or, it could be. That is why these things go through the courts. Remember, people assumed the dude with the wagon was doing something nefarious on election night, even though he wasn't. As for the electronic stuff, well if you say my questions have been answered then it must be so. Still seems odd to not take the senate seats, or at least one, in GA. Or to not go after a state like florida, which has a history of being a swing state. You'd think if you weren't worried about the senate seats you'd pick states that wouldn't be so obvious. Perhaps other posters will have more information to share. Do we know for sure that votes for Trump were switched to Biden, or could they have been switched to Jo? Could votes for Jo have been switched to Biden, too? Are we thinking it was code in every machine in GA, or just some? Do they all need examining? I've heard that some were connected to the internet, does that imply the others were safe? How would they know how many votes to switch with multiple people running for office and an unknown (and then still arriving) number of absentee ballots coming in to be counted? Do anyone have a flow chart handy of how all of this fraud occurred because the methods and size of the conspiracy for each state is starting to run together and get confusing. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
US Special Forces Attacked CIA Server Farm In Germany In Server Seizure Operation, 5 Soldiers Killed
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom