Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
warning or bullet?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HMCS(FMF)Ret." data-source="post: 1506830" data-attributes="member: 12635"><p>I can't believe we've argued about this so long. Regardless of what you say about Title 21, the fact is <strong>you can </strong>defend someone who is under immediate threat of death:</p><p></p><p>OUJI-CR 8-8</p><p></p><p>DEFENSE OF ANOTHER - WHEN DEFENSE AVAILABLE</p><p></p><p>If the person on whose behalf the defendant intervened (was not the original aggressor)/(did not provoke another with the intent to cause the altercation)/(did not voluntarily enter into mutual combat), the defendant may act on his/her reasonable belief that the person is in imminent danger of (death or great bodily harm)/(bodily harm).</p><p></p><p>To say it's unlawful under Title 21 is nothing but an attempt to confuse readers of this thread into believing they don't have a right to protect others unless they themselves were attacked first. This is obviously not true.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HMCS(FMF)Ret., post: 1506830, member: 12635"] I can't believe we've argued about this so long. Regardless of what you say about Title 21, the fact is [B]you can [/B]defend someone who is under immediate threat of death: OUJI-CR 8-8 DEFENSE OF ANOTHER - WHEN DEFENSE AVAILABLE If the person on whose behalf the defendant intervened (was not the original aggressor)/(did not provoke another with the intent to cause the altercation)/(did not voluntarily enter into mutual combat), the defendant may act on his/her reasonable belief that the person is in imminent danger of (death or great bodily harm)/(bodily harm). To say it's unlawful under Title 21 is nothing but an attempt to confuse readers of this thread into believing they don't have a right to protect others unless they themselves were attacked first. This is obviously not true. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
warning or bullet?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom