Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
What do you think about this woman in the Columbine area?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tRidiot" data-source="post: 3226870" data-attributes="member: 9374"><p>I think forcing treatment should only be done in the most extreme cases, of which there are plenty. AND if you are deemed unable to make your own rational decisions AND made a ward of the state because of that, it should be clear cut you don't have the mental capacity to handle and own firearms. However, I think that process needs to be very stringent and clear, with multiple checks and balances and I agree that they should be handled by a group of people who "should be" somewhat impartial. But we need something in place - right now we have NOTHING, until someone has hurt someone.</p><p></p><p>Again... not talking about someone in a domestic disturbance due to an argument over custody or divorce or something similar. I am talking only about those clearly severely mentally ill and deranged. There are PLENTY of those we can deal with and put a process in place than can be evaluated and tweaked over time for effectiveness and fairness. You have to start somewhere.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tRidiot, post: 3226870, member: 9374"] I think forcing treatment should only be done in the most extreme cases, of which there are plenty. AND if you are deemed unable to make your own rational decisions AND made a ward of the state because of that, it should be clear cut you don't have the mental capacity to handle and own firearms. However, I think that process needs to be very stringent and clear, with multiple checks and balances and I agree that they should be handled by a group of people who "should be" somewhat impartial. But we need something in place - right now we have NOTHING, until someone has hurt someone. Again... not talking about someone in a domestic disturbance due to an argument over custody or divorce or something similar. I am talking only about those clearly severely mentally ill and deranged. There are PLENTY of those we can deal with and put a process in place than can be evaluated and tweaked over time for effectiveness and fairness. You have to start somewhere. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
What do you think about this woman in the Columbine area?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom