Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Who will apply for work at Tesla in Tulsa?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shadowrider" data-source="post: 3369139" data-attributes="member: 3099"><p>Red Herrings? Renewable energy is just that! At least in the the context of any foreseeable future.</p><p></p><p>So with that in mind, O&G is a technology that's vital to our way of life AND our national security. We have it right now, it works and it's available for multiple generations to come. So... I guess I just fail to see the need to subsidize it's replacement with federal tax dollars. Perhaps in 75 years we should take a look at it but for now it's just a load bullchit being put on our plate and told it's vegetables that we have to eat. If renewables can make it on their own, then fine. Do that and good luck. But I'm not in support of subsidizing anything we don't really have a compelling need for.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shadowrider, post: 3369139, member: 3099"] Red Herrings? Renewable energy is just that! At least in the the context of any foreseeable future. So with that in mind, O&G is a technology that's vital to our way of life AND our national security. We have it right now, it works and it's available for multiple generations to come. So... I guess I just fail to see the need to subsidize it's replacement with federal tax dollars. Perhaps in 75 years we should take a look at it but for now it's just a load bullchit being put on our plate and told it's vegetables that we have to eat. If renewables can make it on their own, then fine. Do that and good luck. But I'm not in support of subsidizing anything we don't really have a compelling need for. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Who will apply for work at Tesla in Tulsa?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom