Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Why do we continue to elect politicians who do not support Constitutional Carry?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="flybeech" data-source="post: 2002770" data-attributes="member: 7557"><p>I know that you are hardly in the "we" group I question, henchman. <img src="/images/smilies/wink2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink2:" title="Wink2 :wink2:" data-shortname=":wink2:" /></p><p></p><p>"We The People" have developed a habit of electing politicians based on a belief that the letter beside their name is some guarantee of their Constitutional stance on just about anything. Romney is a perfect example of a politician who has a long history of being a liberal gun-grabber that superficially morphs into a 2A supporter, to appeal to a conservative base for no other reasons than marketing. Obama is so openly and notoriously anti-gun that is easy for even the most sleepy American to know exactly where he stands. Sure Obama's dangerous, but perhaps the candidate who feigns 2A support is more dangerous, since many might decide it's no longer necessary to remain vigilant.</p><p></p><p>After 38 years of being a hard-core Republican, it's been tough to accept that it took bi-partisan support to pass legislation like the Patriot Act that destroyed our rights under the 4A and the NDAA that grants the President the ultimate authority to indefinitely detain for life anywhere in the world, torture and assassinate ANY American without ANY due process.</p><p></p><p>As the "reddest state in the nation", all but Coburn voted for the NDAA. Is it unreasonable to think that a RINO that would vote to indefinitely detain American citizens without trial would then be a supporter of Constitutional carry? Hardly. Perhaps I'm wrong and naive, but given the supercharged nature of Constitutional carry, a politician who openly and notoriously supports Constitutional carry is very likely to defend the rest of our Bill of Rights.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="flybeech, post: 2002770, member: 7557"] I know that you are hardly in the "we" group I question, henchman. :wink2: "We The People" have developed a habit of electing politicians based on a belief that the letter beside their name is some guarantee of their Constitutional stance on just about anything. Romney is a perfect example of a politician who has a long history of being a liberal gun-grabber that superficially morphs into a 2A supporter, to appeal to a conservative base for no other reasons than marketing. Obama is so openly and notoriously anti-gun that is easy for even the most sleepy American to know exactly where he stands. Sure Obama's dangerous, but perhaps the candidate who feigns 2A support is more dangerous, since many might decide it's no longer necessary to remain vigilant. After 38 years of being a hard-core Republican, it's been tough to accept that it took bi-partisan support to pass legislation like the Patriot Act that destroyed our rights under the 4A and the NDAA that grants the President the ultimate authority to indefinitely detain for life anywhere in the world, torture and assassinate ANY American without ANY due process. As the "reddest state in the nation", all but Coburn voted for the NDAA. Is it unreasonable to think that a RINO that would vote to indefinitely detain American citizens without trial would then be a supporter of Constitutional carry? Hardly. Perhaps I'm wrong and naive, but given the supercharged nature of Constitutional carry, a politician who openly and notoriously supports Constitutional carry is very likely to defend the rest of our Bill of Rights. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Why do we continue to elect politicians who do not support Constitutional Carry?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom