The only knock on the Ruger I've heard was some of the early guns had a tendency to break the front sight. Not sure if they've corrected that issue or not. As far as ergonomics and features for a carry gun, the Ruger is set up right and the mil-spec Springer leaves a lot to be desired. I'd prefer a Loaded Springer over the Ruger, but not the mil-spec. FWIW, I owned an early mil-spec Springer I upgraded with a beavertail, extended thumb safety and Videcki trigger, so that's from experience. JMO, YMMV