Does not say what you need for it to say.
The woman on the phone, (whoever she may be) doesn't say that DHS or DOJ has ordered any of these targets. She claims that they were "requested by law enforcement" whatever that means.
They are available for purchase. Maybe DHS will put in an order today. Who knows?
LMAO wake the hell up people.
Probably best to talk to someone other than the receptionist. That video/audio kind of reminds me of Michael Moore's technique of blindsiding some low level employee.
Does that mean women, pregnant women and children should order targets with LEO's on them for target practice? Tit for tat?
It's possible that these are "Shoot/No Shoot" targets, hence the absence of scoring rings on these.
The purpose is just the opposite..to quickly identify what may be a typical citizen with a gun.
A quick example:
http://www.challengetargets.com/Category/Hostage_Targets.asp
The purpose is just the opposite..to quickly identify what may be a typical citizen with a gun.
A quick example:
http://www.challengetargets.com/Category/Hostage_Targets.asp
The purpose of these targets is not square range or qualification training.
They are generally used for suprise courses or exercises where the student does not see the target in advance and is forced to make a shoot or don't shoot decision.
Some are designed well and some are designed poorly i.e. postures, facial expressions, etc should indicate a threat or not depending on circumstances.
They are not intended to be hung up and blazed away at. They are intended to be for reactionary/judgement training.
To be honest I am quite suprised that this is coming up now; These type of targets have been in use in the public and private training sector for over two decades.
I guess it gives the conspiracy crowd something to talk about other than drones......
Michael Brown
They are generally used for suprise courses or exercises where the student does not see the target in advance and is forced to make a shoot or don't shoot decision.
Some are designed well and some are designed poorly i.e. postures, facial expressions, etc should indicate a threat or not depending on circumstances.
They are not intended to be hung up and blazed away at. They are intended to be for reactionary/judgement training.
To be honest I am quite suprised that this is coming up now; These type of targets have been in use in the public and private training sector for over two decades.
I guess it gives the conspiracy crowd something to talk about other than drones......
Michael Brown
The purpose of these targets is not square range or qualification training.
They are generally used for suprise courses or exercises where the student does not see the target in advance and is forced to make a shoot or don't shoot decision.
Some are designed well and some are designed poorly i.e. postures, facial expressions, etc should indicate a threat or not depending on circumstances.
They are not intended to be hung up and blazed away at. They are intended to be for reactionary/judgement training.
To be honest I am quite suprised that this is coming up now; These type of targets have been in use in the public and private training sector for over two decades.
I guess it gives the conspiracy crowd something to talk about other than drones......
Michael Brown
You guys are probably right. I've always been skeptical of conspiracy theories but the way this govt is acting as of late sure makes a fella suspicious.
The purpose of these targets is not square range or qualification training.
They are generally used for suprise courses or exercises where the student does not see the target in advance and is forced to make a shoot or don't shoot decision.
Some are designed well and some are designed poorly i.e. postures, facial expressions, etc should indicate a threat or not depending on circumstances.
They are not intended to be hung up and blazed away at. They are intended to be for reactionary/judgement training.
To be honest I am quite suprised that this is coming up now; These type of targets have been in use in the public and private training sector for over two decades.
I guess it gives the conspiracy crowd something to talk about other than drones......
Michael Brown
That was my initial thought, but the name seems to imply otherwise. In the case of these targets you would think one would want some hesitation. And combined with the government buying up enough ammo to last them a century at normal use rates and state governments talking about confiscation you can see how it makes one wonder. On the other hand, maybe they are just poorly named.
Similar threads
