The Armed Attorneys covered this recently, and that's pretty much it. Congress did what it does best and made a minor change in language that manages to completely screw us over.
Or just delete this one. 
There is no gunshow loophole and they haven’t closed it.
They just added a whole bunch of new detail and situations to the “rules” that can be used to define who is dealing in firearms and should be licensed accordingly.
Link to the final rule in the federal register:
https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regul...ion-engaged-business-dealer-firearms/download
They just added a whole bunch of new detail and situations to the “rules” that can be used to define who is dealing in firearms and should be licensed accordingly.
Link to the final rule in the federal register:
https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regul...ion-engaged-business-dealer-firearms/download
Let's please stop using their terminology in calling it a gun show loophole. What IT IS is a lawful sale of property between two citizens. The same with all their other garbage word meaning changes.
It isn't a high capacity magazine, it is an as designed standard capacity magazine.
It isn't an assault rifle, it is a rifle that can be used for assault, or protection, or to keep law an order, or for target shooting, or for a wall hanger, or etc.
It isn't a high capacity magazine, it is an as designed standard capacity magazine.
It isn't an assault rifle, it is a rifle that can be used for assault, or protection, or to keep law an order, or for target shooting, or for a wall hanger, or etc.
Last edited:
Who defines what a profit is? How will they know what you spent? Just my thoughts…
Well they could watch you buy or sell you a gun & have agent buy the gun from you at a profit & you been had.
It’s explained in the proposed rule. See post #44
In trouble- they will be hit with a no-knock and shot on entry
Similar threads
