I believe he was just asking the police officer if he was aware of the new law that goes into effect in November then cut back to the amended law that is in effect.
I believe he was just asking the police officer if he was aware of the new law that goes into effect in November then cut back to the amended law that is in effect.
CC was bill number 2597 not 2010He was quoting HB 2010 which doesn't go into effect until November. He clearly reads that Bill number in the video.
I happen to agree that the existing law already precluded a public or private entity from restricting carry on public property, even if that property is cloaked in some sort of trust....and it is good that 2010 provides some clarity, but he repeatedly relies on 2010 in his discussions with the officers (retired officers/rent a cops) and that law is not in effect yet.
CC was bill number 2597not 2010
Sure I watched the video. All I said was its not 2010, and if you look it up, you will see that.Sure, but 2010 is the amended law that inserted language about public trusts and public trust land and clarifying that those entities cannot restrict concealed carry on that type of property. He is directly referring to 2010, and reading from 2010 as if it is current law. It is not. It was signed by the Governor in April but does not take effect until 1 November.
Did you watch the video?
Sorry it bounced just over your head Bob. Don’t worry yourself too much about it, after all it really is ok to be different.You broke up...what'd ya say? I think I heard something like, those that open carry AR's or other large more noticeable choices are actually doing those that don't carry large weapons a favor. They are kinda wearing a sign (more noticeable weapon) that says "Hey, try n kill me first so these other folks have time to react". Oh and there was something about AO n OODA.
Enter your email address to join: