But defense of oneself is not considered to be a valid reason to carry a firearm upon your property outside the confines of your home. Pierce v State, 1929 OK CR 91, 42 Okl.Cr. 272, 275 P. 393
In short, as far as I can tell, the property provision of Article 2, § 26 has not been addressed directly.
Then whats the hold up, by all means address it, whats your opinion of the matter?
I feel I addressed the issue, twice. Just because Pierce was convicted back in the 20's under seriousy questionable circumstances does not mean I will change my stance on carrying firearms on my property.