The ammunition that has gun owners drooling.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

ignerntbend

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Messages
15,797
Reaction score
3,270
Location
Oklahoma
I've got several kinds of JHPs that I keep for the SD gun. I have tons of ball ammunition that isn't suitable for self defense. If you shot somebody with .45acp FMJ, the EMTs would tell the culprit just to walk it off and quit being a weinie. Everybody knows that stuff is harmless. Take two aspirin and call me in the morning.
 

dennishoddy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
85,101
Reaction score
63,200
Location
Ponca City Ok
. I have tons of ball ammunition that isn't suitable for self defense. If you shot somebody with .45acp FMJ, the EMTs would tell the culprit just to walk it off and quit being a weinie. Everybody knows that stuff is harmless. Take two aspirin and call me in the morning.

LOL. The Ball ammo in what ever caliber has counted for millions of causality's.
 

doctorjj

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
7,041
Reaction score
1,178
Location
Pryor
In addition to dropping the black paint, they redesigned the projectile jacket so the bullets no longer have the "talons" on expansion.

Wrong.
image.jpg
 

tRidiot

Perpetually dissatisfied
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
19,521
Reaction score
12,712
Location
Bartlesville
Am I the only one concerned about OVER penetration and the trocars spinning madly off in all directions after minor wounds/wingings?

I dunno... I still lean towards a large, fully-expanding round with high kinetic energy designed to deliver ALL of that energy into the target, NOT into many different directions and worry about overpenetration and such. Watching those videos I'm not even so concerned about the trocars, but more about the core that doesn't expand at all and seems to function much more like a FMJ, possibly (IMO) overpenetrating.

Just my opinion. Maybe I've got the whole concept wrong, I dunno.

Seems like chrome to me.
 

piston10

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 11, 2012
Messages
4,226
Reaction score
103
Location
Yukon
Am I the only one concerned about OVER penetration and the trocars spinning madly off in all directions after minor wounds/wingings?

I dunno... I still lean towards a large, fully-expanding round with high kinetic energy designed to deliver ALL of that energy into the target, NOT into many different directions and worry about overpenetration and such. Watching those videos I'm not even so concerned about the trocars, but more about the core that doesn't expand at all and seems to function much more like a FMJ, possibly (IMO) overpenetrating.

Just my opinion. Maybe I've got the whole concept wrong, I dunno.

Seems like chrome to me.

Your not the only one. I'm sticking with my PDX 1's and rangers.
 

tRidiot

Perpetually dissatisfied
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
19,521
Reaction score
12,712
Location
Bartlesville
Seems like just a slightly more controlled take on frangible ammo, which I don't think any LE agencies are using routinely these days, are they? For good reason...
 

ASP785

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
1,622
Reaction score
4
Location
Collinsville
Am I the only one concerned about OVER penetration and the trocars spinning madly off in all directions after minor wounds/wingings?

I dunno... I still lean towards a large, fully-expanding round with high kinetic energy designed to deliver ALL of that energy into the target, NOT into many different directions and worry about overpenetration and such. Watching those videos I'm not even so concerned about the trocars, but more about the core that doesn't expand at all and seems to function much more like a FMJ, possibly (IMO) overpenetrating.

Just my opinion. Maybe I've got the whole concept wrong, I dunno.

Seems like chrome to me.

My take on the matter is more of the opposite, I am skeptical of the penetration claims. If you take a look at a 77 grain MK262 loading, you see this projectile sheds its jacket into a bunch of little pieces and the remaining mass penetrates about 12-13". It creates a massive wound channel in ballistic gel, but its performance on barriers is poor. It's similar in concept to this round in its fragmentation. I am skeptical that a pistol projectile with a mass of only 96 grains can shed that mass into multiple fragments and penetrate 16+ inches. A solid copper, non fragmenting 55 grain Barnes bullet will penetrate just over 16" in calibrated ballistic gel. I am not saying its impossible, but I just want to see some independent testing before I will buy the hype. The released marketing videos are impressive.

55 grain Barnes
http://www.ar15.com/ammo/project/Ballistic_Gel_Experiments/BARNES/Barnes_5.56_55gr_TAC-X.pdf

77 grain Mk262 Mod 1
http://www.ar15.com/ammo/project/Ballistic_Gel_Experiments/BTAmmoLabsTest6/Test6.htm
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom