Sutherland Springs church shooting is Academy's fault?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Cowcatcher

Unarmed boating accident survivor
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 22, 2017
Messages
6,171
Reaction score
13,853
Location
Inola

Cowcatcher

Unarmed boating accident survivor
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 22, 2017
Messages
6,171
Reaction score
13,853
Location
Inola
It seems like back when this shooting happened, soon after, I heard the guy had slipped through the cracks somehow and shouldn't have passed a background check. Seems like maybe he was discharged from the military and was a woman beater? I could have it all wrong but there was something up.
 

Aries

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 1, 2019
Messages
5,550
Reaction score
8,122
Location
Sapulpa
This is not a new tactic. The trend before 2005 was to sue the gun manufacturer if their product was used in the commission of a crime. In 2005 congress passed the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act to prevent those kinds of lawsuits, the purpose of which was to drive gun manufacturers out of business by making them liable. This is just another way to try to make Academy stop selling firearms because the liability risk is too great. If you can't get laws passed to ban guns, the next best thing is to make them impossible to buy.
 

dennishoddy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
84,854
Reaction score
62,634
Location
Ponca City Ok
It all started with suing tobacco companies for one's own stupidity.

Seriously? Inhaling smoke that makes ya hack, gag, and cough might be bad for ya?

Who knew... :drunk2:
When they put addictive substances into the blend, they become culpable to a conspiracy to make people addicted to nicotine.
That is the basis for the lawsuit against them.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom