Tin foil solved, the first of 30,000 armed drones to be deployed in US skies

[HMFIC]

Denying the facts, no source will ever be good enough for some people. Go down and talk to the sheriff yourself , I can't prove to you what you refuse to see. You ask for articles, articles given, then you change it up again,HILarious

Ask the Sheriff what?

The only thing hilarious is how OSA has somehow turned into a depository for all of this insanity. Actually... it's not hilarious, it's shameful that it's been allowed to continue and I don't understand why.

 

[LightningCrash]

I can not provide anything, maybe ummm try try to do some research yourselves?

Ever think of that?

huh? huh?

Do you fellas ever research anything, or just pass everything off as crazy?

Yeah, its a crazy thought of armed drones in America, however, just having drones in America should be enough to set off red flags with the general public.

Does that not bother you guys? I mean, who is ok with that?

You assume that everyone who disagrees with you has not done any research. Yet you just post a link from infowars and claim you've done your due diligence.

Your paranoid fantasies only bother other people who have paranoid fantasies, sorry.

 

[LightningCrash]

Houses passes bill banning DHS funding of armed domestic drones. ACLU supports the measure even though arming drones has "not really been contemplated".
https://www.aclu.org/blog/technolog...-national-security/ban-arming-domestic-drones

Rand Paul introduces bill banning domestic surveillance drones.
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/06/12/sen-paul-says-no-to-domestic-drones/?hpt=hp_bn13

 

[HMFIC]

Houses passes bill banning DHS funding of armed domestic drones. ACLU supports the measure even though arming drones has "not really been contemplated".
https://www.aclu.org/blog/technolog...-national-security/ban-arming-domestic-drones

Rand Paul introduces bill banning domestic surveillance drones.
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/06/12/sen-paul-says-no-to-domestic-drones/?hpt=hp_bn13

AH!!! Now we have the truth. THANK YOU LC!

 

[dennishoddy]

Dang Crash! I was starting to be a believer, and you brought me back to reality! LOL!

 

[jsl_pt]

Ask the Sheriff what?

The only thing hilarious is how OSA has somehow turned into a depository for all of this insanity. Actually... it's not hilarious, it's shameful that it's been allowed to continue and I don't understand why.

Shameful to be vigilant for our rights? I don't think so.

If you read the article you would see the sheriff is wanting to arm drones in his county with tear gas and rubber bullets.

As fR being allowed to continue, Can we not respond to general discussions in the general discussion forum? Or are you wanting censorship?

 

[jsl_pt]

Houses passes bill banning DHS funding of armed domestic drones. ACLU supports the measure even though arming drones has "not really been contemplated".
https://www.aclu.org/blog/technolog...-national-security/ban-arming-domestic-drones

Rand Paul introduces bill banning domestic surveillance drones.
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/06/12/sen-paul-says-no-to-domestic-drones/?hpt=hp_bn13

And I am in favor of both of these however just because it is proposed or passed it is not yet law, civics 101, lol.

Side note why is there a bill to stop funding of armed drones drones if we haven't already started, hmmm

 

[HMFIC]

Shameful to be vigilant for our rights? I don't think so.

If you read the article you would see the sheriff is wanting to arm drones in his county with tear gas and rubber bullets.

As fR being allowed to continue, Can we not respond to general discussions in the general discussion forum? Or are you wanting censorship?

Yup. That's exactly what I want.

 

[dennishoddy]

And I am in favor of both of these however just because it is proposed or passed it is not yet law, civics 101, lol.

Side note why is there a bill to stop funding of armed drones drones if we haven't already started, hmmm

Good grief dude. Do you not realize that there are some in the government that are actually looking out for us?

 

[reddog1]

I think what noober was saying is, why would the House try pass a bill banning DHS funding of armed domestic drones, if its just thunk up funk from stupid people from OSA who should shut up? (like me?)

Thanks for the citations crash!