If I apply your logic and line of thought then I guess we should be allowed to use a spotlight? I mean your opinion could just as easily be used to support that as well. .
No, that would be unethical utilizing the cover of darkness and a blinding light that reduces the opportunity for escape in many cases.
Not allowing someone to use a silencer is not forcing someones methods on another. .
Only because it's not legalized yet and has not been an accepted practice for the past 70 years in the US.
How does another person's use of a supressor constitute unethical hunting and infringe on your rigths? There is still a loud crack to alert the game, the muzzel blast is just not as extreme right next to the hunter.
I just think that with all the attacks we have on our rights our energy would be better spent fighting/defending something not quite so silly and with a wider benefit ratio.
.
Regardless, its still one less freedom that we have because of the mind set of people that work for us that think supressors are evil. Why not at least bring it up.
I'm sorry but the thought of heading out on a hunting trip with a silencer is almost comical. I can assure you however, that those in the anti crowd would not find it so funny and would have a field day with it. I think even those who don't hunt yet are indifferent to the gun issue would have a problem with this one.
Again, pick your battles wisely.
Thats fine, because you are not forced to head out to the woods with a supressor. In the eyes of those ignorant about nature hunting ,regardless of method, is not so funny. They are completly ignorant about the need for hunting and conservation. How is the use of a supressor going to change anything in that concern.
Honestly I really doubt that very few would take advantage of it because of the expense. Regardless there is no reason for it not to be allowed. It's just one right that has been taken away from us out of ignorance.