Department Of Homeland Security To Reform Secure Communities Deportation Program

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

JB Books

Shooter Emeritus
Special Hen
Joined
Dec 31, 1969
Messages
14,111
Reaction score
190
Location
Hansenland
MINNEAPOLIS -- The Department of Homeland Security announced reforms to a key immigration enforcement program Friday, responding to criticism from state governments and advocacy groups.

Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) had called for reforms to the Secure Communities immigration enforcement program earlier Friday.

"Fix Secure Communities so you go after drug dealers and gang bangers, not the guy who is washing dishes or the Windex-wielding lady at Walmart at night," Gutierrez told a group of reporters at Netroots Nation, adding that many people detained through the fingerprint-sharing program are never convicted with a crime.

The program, which allows immigration authorities to access fingerprints taken by local police, has come under fire for netting a large number of undocumented immigrants who have never committed a serious crime, even though it is touted as a method for deporting violent criminals.

The reforms announced Friday will allow Immigration and Customs Enforcement to incorporate more discretion into Secure Communities to filter out men and women who have not been convicted of crimes.

"Secure Communities is a critical tool for law enforcement agencies working to protect the citizens and communities they serve," ICE Director John Morton said in a statement. "However, we need to do a better job of ensuring that the program is more focused on targeting those that pose the biggest risk to communities."

In particular, the agency plans to implement a new policy to protect people who are the victims of domestic violence and are netted by the program, because some law enforcement agencies routinely book both parties in domestic disputes.

Story continues below
Advertisement

AdvertisementAdvertisementThe new policy, explained in a June 17 memorandum from Morton, tells Secure Communities actors to work to discourage fears that calling the police will lead to deportation.

"ICE officers, special agents, and attorneys should exercise all appropriate prosecutorial discretion to minimize any effect that immigration enforcement may have on the willingness and ability of victims, witnesses and plaintiffs to call police and pursue justice," he wrote in the memo.

The reforms also include new training materials to educate communities about the program and the creation of an advisory committee that will investigate how to deal with minor offenders, such as people booked for repeat traffic violations or driving without a license.

The agency also created a complaint system for Secure Communities and will conduct quarterly statistical reviews of the program.

But that may not be enough for critics of the program, who have demanded major changes and have even asked the administration to abandon Secure Communities altogether.

Gutierrez called for Obama to fix Secure Communities as a larger suggested executive action on immigration. He said Obama should help stop deportation of young people who would benefit from the DREAM Act, a failed bill that would allow some undocumented young people and family members of U.S. citizens to earn legal status.

The reform announcement does not include a method for states and localities to block fingerprints taken in their jails from going to immigration authorities, despite push back from Illinois, New York and Massachusetts, whose governors said they would not participate in the program.

The reform announcement came two months before immigration authorities are set to investigate the program and whether officials misled state and local authorities about whether it would be mandatory. The investigation, requested by Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), will begin in August.

"Reform before review not only puts the cart before the horse, it continues to take the country in the wrong direction," Pablo Alvarado, director of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, said in a statement. "Given the inherent problems to the program and the continued secrecy in its implementation, S-Comm should be suspended immediately until the Office of the Inspector General can complete its report."

Still, advocates of reform said DHS has taken a step in the right direction.

"Today’s announcement shows that concerns about the program’s failures have finally penetrated the DHS bureaucracy in Washington," Lynn Tramonte, deputy director of America’s Voice Education Fund, said in a statement. "When law enforcement leaders and advocates for crime victims are speaking out against a ‘law enforcement’ proposal, something is wrong."
 

Lone Wolf '49

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 18, 2008
Messages
3,132
Reaction score
8
Location
Oklahoma City
JB, and not going on about the Soros thing. Seriously, I believe and I think you would too, if I understand you, don't you think this is all for the votes/elections/ and so forth that they are looking for as it is quoted the politicians are Democrats from Blue states? Just a first thought.
 

dennishoddy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
85,133
Reaction score
63,288
Location
Ponca City Ok
Kind of ineresting they are filtering out those that have not committed a "serious" crime, and those with "no crimes" on their record?
I have always been under the assumption that being an illegal alien was a crime in itself?
 

Lone Wolf '49

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 18, 2008
Messages
3,132
Reaction score
8
Location
Oklahoma City
Kind of ineresting they are filtering out those that have not committed a "serious" crime, and those with "no crimes" on their record?
I have always been under the assumption that being an illegal alien was a crime in itself?

Well, I see it as going for the legal voters if there are any, but I don't follow and think of it as well as I used to do so. But Illinois? Let me remember if I can. How many votes were purchased if one will in that area for that particular election in 1960?
Mr. Kennedy or the old man had many connections with the so called mob and I would not be surprised if those are still around. I mean look at Obummers staff and so forth. I was in Chicago in the early 70's, a military thing'. We wore only civilian attire and stayed out of the way when we could of anything. They or all of the blue collars, (that is where I spent most of my time then in Chicago) they loved the old man Daily, Mayor. It was not hard to find the old connections to the old ways back then. I apologize for getting away from the thread as I always do, but there is a lot of trivia and things that are out there and Chicago is, well, what else can I say but CORRUPTION. Side note though, one bar owner on the southeast side I used to visit with was an Okie, both he and his wife, so for a young guy out of his pocket, I did have some interesting days there when, let us say not working.
Good night and thanks for listening to the rant.
 

JB Books

Shooter Emeritus
Special Hen
Joined
Dec 31, 1969
Messages
14,111
Reaction score
190
Location
Hansenland
The immigration advocates are pissed that Obama did not run through an immigration reform in 2009 or 2010. He could have and would have gained a very, very strong hold on the Hispanic vote.

Traditional Hispanic values are more in line with the Republican party. However, because there has been so much rhetoric, and because Republican legislators have been advancing harsh measures, especially on the state level, most Hispanics will vote Democratic, if they vote at all. Ultimately, this is going to bite the Republican party in the butt.

Given the choice of Obama, or a Republican candidate who will likely make immigration an issue, I think the Hispanic vote will go Democrat by default.

We talk about this from time to time here. Sometimes rationally, sometimes not so rationally. At some point the federal government is going to have to step up and do its job and solve this problem. I suspect the solution will not make either side happy.
 

dennishoddy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
85,133
Reaction score
63,288
Location
Ponca City Ok
How can they vote at all if they are illegal criminals?
When I registered to vote many years ago, I had to show proper ID?
Of course I was in a foreign land in service of this country.
Perhaps the people in this country should do the same?
 

dennishoddy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
85,133
Reaction score
63,288
Location
Ponca City Ok
I didnt have to show properID until last year, in accordance with the new state law.

Perhaps other states can be as forward looking as ok?

Probably not, as that is how they manipulate elections to elect their chosen candidates.
 

spamby

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
2,159
Reaction score
0
Location
B.A.
I just hope they finally get started on making a decision. Its been a long time over due. Both sides of the issue want a decision but as is usual in America they both want something different.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom