RP says no to school security.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

TedKennedy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
11,605
Reaction score
13,301
Location
Tulsa
Well...some of our more...ahem..."less priviledged" schools already have multiple armed police.

Some of those same schools wouldn't be targets of a cowardly shooter, as the second graders be packin'.....
 

sumoj275

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Messages
4,462
Reaction score
203
Location
OKC
Stop giving away foreign aid to country's and take care of our own here. Arming teachers that can handle it would be a great solution too.
 

RickN

Eye Bleach Salesman
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
25,673
Reaction score
34,939
Location
Edmond
RickN, in what ways do you disagree with Paul on this issue?

1) That we can not afford it. We can by just cutting a tiny portion of government waste.
2) That having armed police in schools is some how a bad thing. We have them in many other places why not protecting our most helpless?

For the record, one of the things I dislike most about our government is that they pass tons of laws but NEVER hire enough boots on the ground to enforce them. Just one example, "Lets raise taxes on the rich", but there are billions in unpaid taxes out there already.
 

Hobbes

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
8,737
Reaction score
749
Location
The Nations
1)

For the record, one of the things I dislike most about our government is that they pass tons of laws but NEVER hire enough boots on the ground to enforce them. Just one example, "Lets raise taxes on the rich", but there are billions in unpaid taxes out there already.
Do you favor hiring more IRS employees "boots on the ground" to enforce those laws and collect those "unpaid taxes"?
 

Dave70968

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
6,676
Reaction score
4,619
Location
Norman
Somebody find me something in Article I, Section 8 that has to do with school security--or schools at all, for that matter--and we can talk. Otherwise, you're just advocating growing fed.gov past its constitutional limits because you happen to like the cause.

Principles are what you do when it's not convenient.
 

TerryMiller

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
18,980
Reaction score
19,127
Location
Here, but occasionally There.
For what it's worth, I've seen the federal government at work with education. Back in the '80's, I was a school board member. That is when my eyes were opened to the fact that when the feds started providing money for school lunches, it then started dictating "conditions" to the school districts.

Can you imagine how far they would take things by paying for armed guards in schools? First of all, they would likely require that all those guards be "federalized" and unionized. Then we would have a "TSA-like" force wrecking havoc in our schools.

I'm for letting responsible and trained teachers and administrators be the ones to be carrying weapons. The proposed bill for allowing CLEET trained school officials and teachers carry concealed here in Oklahoma is fine with me. I DON'T think that individuals who have only been trained in the CCW class be the ones carrying.

As for Ron Paul.....pfffttt. While some of the things he advocates may be good, if his "handling" of such things were similar to his votes in Congress, I would be very suspicious of him.
 

Republicanhack

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
1,476
Reaction score
0
Location
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
What we really need is to increase the police state, children need to know that there will always be a policeman near to protect them and they need to further militarize our police departments while they are at it. I say put a sniper on the roof of each school too, maybe park an APC out front so those little kids will always know that big brother will protect them. I love seeing the people who hate Ron Paul disagree with everything he says, if Mitt had said we couldn't afford it his lemmings would be denouncing the very idea of having a cop at each school, but since Paul said it it can't be true. We can afford it, just borrow more money from China to fund it like the Republicans and democrats are so fond of doing for everything else. The Ron Paul derangement syndrome is hilarious tho, the hatred for him from so called conservatives is only matched by their hatred for other true conservatives and MAYBE Barry.
 

Cedar Creek

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 31, 2010
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
15
Location
SW Oklahoma
One problem with having armed guards for each school is the number of buildings a lot of schools have on each campus. It would take a LOT of officers to cover a medium sized high school campus - ag building & shop, gym, fieldhouse, woodshop, etc - not to mention the multitude of portable buildings a lot of districts utilize. And if some jack really wanted to wreak havoc - how about graduation, a basketball game, football game, etc. Lots of people crowded together and much easier to bring weapons & accesories in inside a tote bag or backpack.

Cedar Creek
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom