I agree with this sentiment, but, wouldn't that require several things...
1. That the raid planner had been trained and shown aptitude for planning raids.
2. That the raid planner had any clue about tactics or logistics used in raiding a structure.
3. That the raid planner had any idea of trying to make the raid successful and not overly dangerous to anyone, raiders or raidees...
That's a great argument for departmental negligence.
Negligence requires a duty of care, and a breach of that duty. When the duty is breached, I start to view those culpable (which may start with a desk jockey, but still includes the guys chucking grenades) as less "innocent" than, say, an infant child.