You've lowered the bar, again. There went your credibility.
Damn, and it's all I had going for me!
You've lowered the bar, again. There went your credibility.
I think you posted something similar to this the other day, didn't you? Why do you bother with this online bantering with those with no credibility?
Is there not someone on the internet with an opposing opinion to yours that meets your credibility standard?
So anyone who thinks that law enforcement is a danger to society has daddy issues?
What about those that think LEOs are just puppets for politicians?
The camera phones and the Internet have exposed a problem that is much larger than individual LEOs care to admit.
Actually, it was another thread where you used a similar statement. That's cool, repitition is better than creativity, according to some.
I wonder who would be more likely to have had "daddy" issues:
The guy that believes in non-aggression, and liberty, letting people alone unless they are attempting violence on another; or :
A guy that wants to be "put in authority" and dress up in a uniform and put handcuffs on people?
Is that your expert medical opinion? Tell me, where did you do your psych residency?Now we are getting somewhere in explaining your metaphorical hard on with law enforcement and authority figures. To say that LEOs are the “emblem of that force” and the “thin end of the “wedge” that is “breaking into homes” to try to “exercise their domain over you” is somewhere south of immature and in the zip code of paranoid.
Let me “spell it out for you”, you have “daddy issues”.
I didn't say "all law enforcement is a danger to society." However, if you can find a way to identify which ones are dangerous at any given time, I think we'd all be interested. Maybe special badges...but given than an individual officer can be a credit to the uniform most of the time and still do something wrong from time-to-time, you'll probably need something electronic to give a real-time status.Anyone who thinks all law enforcement is a danger to society is bumping uglies with the loons that think all gun owners are criminals. Do you think law enforcement is a “danger to society”? If so, let’s see if you can explain such shrill logic any better than Dave.
Never said the stats classes were taught in the dorms. I said I lived in the dorms, which were located in the same ZIP code as the rest of the campus. Try reading for comprehension next time.Camera phones work both ways. As to the “problem” you and Dave suggest, it appears you have your tin foil hat on too tight, didn’t quite get the gist of the stat classes taught “in the dorm rooms” at OSU … or have daddy issues.
You should get together with “caojyn” and build a really big straw man.
Anyone who thinks all law enforcement is a danger to society is bumping uglies with the loons that think all gun owners are criminals. Do you think law enforcement is a “danger to society”? If so, let’s see if you can explain such shrill logic any better than Dave.
I hope Obama Care can help them.
Camera phones work both ways. As to the “problem” you and Dave suggest, it appears you have your tin foil hat on too tight, didn’t quite get the gist of the stat classes taught “in the dorm rooms” at OSU … or have daddy issues.
Enter your email address to join: