I wouldn't get all giddy over the summit with Kim just yet.I seriously doubt any of us here understand the complexities of international trade.
What I think is correct is that we have a President who knows how to negotiate by throwing opponents off-balance and even using some fright techniques. His success in dealing with a seemingly impossible situation in Korea has earned him the right to try a similar approach to the trade imbalance issue. I have no doubt that the President's international trade experts do know what is going on. Conventional wisdom and approaches have not been working in this area so Trump is trying a different approach. A cynic might wonder if past adminisrations might not have been somehow "influenced" to favor other economies over our own.
Feel free to disagree and to rant about Trump being a know-nothing but you might end up with egg on your face.
Trump gave Kim what every N. Korean dictator has wanted since the armistice, a face to face meeting with a US president which his people see as equals now.
Trump cancelled joint military exercises with ROK and even used the term that Kim and Putin have used, "provocative".
And what did Trump get in return?
A vague promise to denuclearize(whatever that means in Kim's mind) at some nebulous date in the future. Maybe.
No declaration of nuclear stockpiles and their locations.
No agreement to allow UN weapons inspectors to examine either locations or weapons.
No commitment to reduce his weapons stockpiles at all.
Even worse, the latest satellite images taken since the summit show that he is building up and improving the nuclear research facility at Yongbyon.