I've pondered MLR's question for a while and have determined the most scientific answer I can come up with:
Because dudes and chicks are different.
Because dudes and chicks are different.
How is it different?
I've pondered MLR's question for a while and have determined the most scientific answer I can come up with:
Because dudes and chicks are different.
In that case we should change the law to reflect that difference. It would be much less hypocritical. If there is no need for a law that attempts to protect male children it should not be on the books.I've pondered MLR's question for a while and have determined the most scientific answer I can come up with:
Because dudes and chicks are different.
Oh, her mom was in on it too.
And mom's a principal in the school district.
http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/news_a...new-details-on-case-of-alleged-sex-with-minor
I just hit reply to your post. Wasnt directed so much at you, but the many that are saying the same thing and actually believe it.There was a certain level (around 99%) of sarcasm in my post.
I agree on the double standard part. HS dude knocks the bottom out of an older female teacher, he's a hero. Older male teacher knocks the bottom out of someone's HS daughter, he's a dirtbag.
Enter your email address to join: