So you're saying that the officers should dictate to command who will work where and when? Yeah...Right...
Not saying that at all. Common sense would dictate, to avoid a problem, let the gay cops work the gay parade.
So you're saying that the officers should dictate to command who will work where and when? Yeah...Right...
So what you are saying is if an EMT at your local fire station gets a call about a man with a heart attack and it is the man's partner calling in, he can have the ability to refuse to answer the call and just try to pass it on to someone else? What if it was a black man? Woman? Muslim?
Someone did. Since the officer's name had not been released (per the story) it seems reasonable to guess that it wasn't him.Who brought it to the press? Are you saying the agency pushed the story?
I guess you don't understand police work. Officers get to volunteer for assignments or apply for certain semi-permanent postings, but they don't get to refuse the ones they don't want to work. If you don't run your own business, chances are you don't get to decide what you do or don't do for the people you work under. In a public trust position, it gets even more limited. They can't afford to have dissenters making demands. Pretty soon, everyone is making demands and nothing works. The system breaks down.
Whether any of you like it or not, sexual orientation is a protected class. If you want to refuse service to them, then you don't belong in a public trust position, period. I don't get why that's so hard to understand?
Not saying that at all. Common sense would dictate, to avoid a problem, let the gay cops work the gay parade.
True enough but mardi gras isn't a celebration heterosexuality.
So what you are saying is if an EMT at your local fire station gets a call about a man with a heart attack and it is the man's partner calling in, he can have the ability to refuse to answer the call and just try to pass it on to someone else? What if it was a black man? Woman? Muslim?
I don't have a problem with that. Try being a white male police officer going to arrest a female Muslim in an ongoing domestic assault in a room with other devout male Muslim men. See if you can do break up the fight and arrest the
Muslim woman without actually touching her.
Maybe a little insight on why he refused.
SAN DIEGO, California, January 28, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Four California firefighters forced to participate in a gay pride parade in July 2007 are victorious after the California Supreme Court this week refused to hear the city’s petition to review an appellate court decision last year.
The four men, led by Fire Capt. John Ghiotto of the San Diego Fire-Rescue Department, filed the suit against the city of San Diego for sexual harassment a month after a battalion chief directly ordered them to ride a fire engine in a lewd parade through the city streets. The men endured verbal abuse and come-ons, as well as overtly sexual gestures from the crowd.
“You could not even look at the crowd without getting some type of sexual gesture,” stated the original complaint, which noted that Christian protesters reviled them for joining the parade. Had the men refused, Ghiotto noted, the men risked being immediately suspended and stripped of any chance of promotion.
“As a supervisor I felt disgusted and embarrassed, that I had to subject my crew to this type of behavior.”
An initial trial ended in a hung jury in September 2008, before a jury sided with the firefighters the following February. After the San Diego attorney’s office appealed, the firefighters won again in October of last year, when the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District issued a ruling strongly in their favor.
Charles LiMandri, the general counsel for the California branch of the National Organization for Marriage who represented the firefighters, told LifeSiteNews.com that his clients were “delighted” with the outcome.
“It’s an important case because it shows that if Christian or people of faith generally are willing to stand up for their religious beliefs, and refuse to be bullied by secular agendas, that they do have rights that can and should be enforced in court,” said LiMandri. “In this case those rights were upheld.”
LiMandri said that it also “sends a strong message to people about what these gay pride parades are really like.”
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/sa...ous-in-suit-against-forced-participation-in-g
What would a cop do at one of those parades if he (or she) witnessed something immoral that is against the law? Do the homosexuals get a free pass because it's "their" parade?
Denver PD has to work 420 fest, NOPD has to work Mardi Gras, Chicago PD has to work Lolapalooza, etc, etc. If seeing "unsavory" things offends your delicate sensibilities, you shouldn't be a fawking cop. Work your assignments or get fired - it should be that simple. These lifesite.news "firefighters" sound like a bunch of pusssies who need to take an accounting job somewhere. So sorry they "endured" some queers acting goofy and having fun. Sounds like hell.
Who went to Tulsa Tough yesterday? TPD was there.
Enter your email address to join: