DPMS 16" AR with 100-round drum- Check
crap-ton of Hornady Zombie-rated ammo- Check
Crows Nest on the second story- Check
Lock n load fellas,
Git yer Zombie on....
whoa I'm the original - no copycats please.....and I get my zombie on daily....
DPMS 16" AR with 100-round drum- Check
crap-ton of Hornady Zombie-rated ammo- Check
Crows Nest on the second story- Check
Lock n load fellas,
Git yer Zombie on....
I just had to repost this for those that dont read allll the posts...Wow. From a face-eater thread to a legalization thread! I don't really know where to stand on the "harder than weed" drugs, but I think if they just made marijuana a schedule 2 drug where it was legal with a prescription, I don't think the world would collapse, you would have plenty of tax revenue generated for the .gov and you could still enforce DUI laws for it the same as liquor laws. Just my .02. I think there's too much federal money tied up in law enforcement of marijuana so it'll probably never happen.
Rick, why aren't you calling for prohibition on any thing that can cause bodily harm?
It's hypocrisy at it's finest.
What we call a modern conservative is as often intellectually dishonest as he is hypocritical.
A modern conservative lives in a strange and cruel world. When THE DEMS WANT TO BAN YOUR CIGARS, it's clearly the result of a nanny state, daddy-knows-best, progressive government gone off the rails. But when the republicans want to ban something similar - for allegedly similar reasons - it's clearly because CONSERVATIVE AMERICAN VALUES AND MORALS are indisputably what's best for the country and we need a good, strong, right-thinking government to uphold and enforce those values.
The "small government, personal responsibility, and freedom/regulate & enforce & expand" dichotomy is either intellectual dishonesty in an attempt to confuse others, or it's an attempt to mollify the cognitive dissonance created in one's own mind from basing his life around a belief system that's two main cores are diametrically incongruous.
A modern conservative doesn't want small government, personal responsibility, freedom or any of the buzzwords they love to project at the sight of any opposition like so much spittle from an angry llama. Modern conservatism is based on one thing and that's fear. They fear change. Change = progress = progressives and progressives are bad (even if we don't know why). They support a strong, far-reaching, and powerful government in order to prop up and enforce each and every facet of what they see as the only correct, good, and viable lifestyle that can exist in a successful nation.
This is mainly how modern conservatives differ from modern liberals. A politically aware liberal is generally honest about what he wants out of government. He'll tell you he wants expanded social programs, well-funded public education, healthcare, various types of civil rights legislation, tight regulation on business and tax increases to fund it all. You can go up to a modern liberal and say "so, you like a strong, far-reaching government?" and he'll say "Yeah, of course. Here's why." Say the same to a conservative, he'll get offended at the implication - right before he gets on a soap box about gays settling down or drug control saving society or women being allowed to make their own healthcare choices and how government should fix it.
As far as the anecdotal drug stories, my how fun and unproductive it would be for me to be a one-upper here. I'll summarize and repeat the main thing I've learned from it all - and that is the vast majority of desperate addicts with destroyed lives I've know went into drugs already mentally ill and suicidal. The drugs didn't do anything but kill them slower than a self-inflicted gunshot would have if they'd gone that route. Serious addiction is generally a just an easily visible symptom of what lies below, and like most conservative "solutions" to social problems, the drug war doesn't address the root cause at all.
tl;dr
cliffs?
And the point that you don't seem to get is that you're a would-be petty tyrant who wants to dictate to others how they live their lives. Maybe not in every respect, but that just makes your desire to rule others a matter of degree.
BTW, since you seem to think Prohibition was a good idea, why don't you explain A) how effective it was, and B) what were the side-effects? Here's a topic starter for you: would Al Capone have been such a wealthy and influential figure if booze had been legal?
Outlawing booze has been tried and if they did it again it would not bother me, and I agree . Hell eating a diet beans and cabbage while living in an enclosed space can kill you. (don't laugh it has happened)
From face munching to fart huffing in less than two pages. It's scary out there.
(Don't click it - it's probably from the liberal media)
http://www.snopes.com/humor/follies/methane.asp
From face munching to fart huffing in less than two pages. It's scary out there.
Enter your email address to join: