Journalism vs. Lib Anti-2nd Amendment propaganda

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

RugersGR8

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
32,813
Reaction score
56,377
Location
NW OK
Please read these two articles about a school stabbing in China(same day as the CT shooting) and tell me which is journalism and which is a lib anti-2nd-Amendment hit piece:


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2248054/China-stabbing-22-children-elderly-woman-stabbed-outside-primary-school-Chinese-knifeman.html
22 children and elderly woman stabbed outside primary school by Chinese knifeman
By Phil Vinter
PUBLISHED: 09:31 EST, 14 December 2012
UPDATED: 10:12 EST, 15 December 2012

AND......

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/12/22-kids-slashed-in-china-elementary-school-knife-attack/
Dec 15, 2012 12:53pm
22 Kids Slashed in China Elementary School Knife Attack
By Alyssa Newcomb
 

IndVet

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
920
Reaction score
59
Location
Choctaw
Two articles written by two different people in two different countries.

How are we supposed to compare them?

Using the China attack in arguments supporting the 2A may not be the best idea.
 

RugersGR8

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
32,813
Reaction score
56,377
Location
NW OK
So 22 kids survived a knife attack in China, but 20 children didnt survive a gun attack in Connnecticut.
Ok. uh.... what are you trying to say exactly?




From the ABC article/propaganda:
.."Private ownership of firearms is banned in China, making gun crimes rare in the country, according to the Chinese government’s official English language website."..

They have had gun bans/control in China, Russia, Germany. How many people were slaughtered under Mao Tse Tung?, Uncle Joe Stalin?, Adolf Hitler?(I think history says millions and millions!). How many other people from those countries, that didn't have guns, have been killed/slaughtered BECAUSE THEIR COUNTRY HAD GUN BANS/CONTROL AND THEY LIVED UNDER A DICTATORSHIP? Also the video that stick4 posted pretty well sums up the lib MSM. Another good video about the lib MSM is this one(it has also been posted before): Charlie Brooker's Newswipe 25/03/09, http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=PezlFNTGWv4. Funny thing is that, under dictatorships, the party members/Kool-Aid drinkers can have all the guns(any kind of gun) that they want. Just because someone lives in a country that has gun control DOES NOT GUARANTEE THEIR SAFETY OR THEIR FREEDOM. Total control of our guns and everything else is just more of the lib party's agenda of grabbing for power and control.
 

Fredkrueger100

Dream Master
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Aug 16, 2012
Messages
7,870
Reaction score
6,178
Location
Shawnee, OK
Why don't the liberal media do a story on how violent crimes and homicides have steadily declined since 1990 even with less tight gun control. Yes crimes still happen, they always will but this is proof positive that passing tighter gun laws is not the answer. How hard is it to try and fix the real problem. Which is the people and not the firearms. Even though guns are rarely used in China they usually use knives or explosives. Explosives?? Can you imagine what kind of massacres would happen here if people started doing that. Does the media and every other anti gun fool in this country not remember about the OKC bombing??? Look at how many people Mcveigh killed with a bomb. Where there's a will there is a way. Criminals will always find a way to carry out their sick plan.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom