Land O' Lakes drops 'racist' Native American image from packaging after nearly 100 years

[chazroh]

Cut the knees off one side of the package, cut a 3 sided flap on her chest from another side, tape the set of knees on the inside of the carton that you cut the flap in. @dennishoddy

 

[Snattlerake]

If you're gonna do it

 

[Gringobandito]

I think that is a Black woman.

And holy **it she is smokin hot.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[chazroh]

like this, @dennishoddy

 

[dennishoddy]

View attachment 159929
like this, @dennishoddy

I LIKE!

 

[donner]

A private company makes a decision about its branding needs. Oh the horror! THE HORROR!

 

[OKNewshawk]

A private company makes a decision about its branding needs. Oh the horror! THE HORROR!

It's the reasoning behind the decision. If they wanted to freshen up their packaging, then I'm all for it. If they're caving in to SJWs, then I think they're wrong--because the SJWs will take the move as a sign of weakness and keep agitating for more concessions. You never give in to bullies.

 

[p238shooter]

Yep, kinda like Chevrolet "freshened up their packaging" several years ago. I am done with them, just can't get this bowtie tatoo off my forehead.

 

[donner]

It's the reasoning behind the decision. If they wanted to freshen up their packaging, then I'm all for it. If they're caving in to SJWs, then I think they're wrong--because the SJWs will take the move as a sign of weakness and keep agitating for more concessions. You never give in to bullies.

I'm sure they will take your thoughts on the matter and file them next to the opinions of the SJW then. Some will say it must be changed because of what it might mean. Others clearly say it shouldn't be changed.

Both sides are full of ****. The company needs to look out for its longterm interests, regardless of which side of the issue it ultimately falls on because clearly it's going to piss someone off.

 

[dennishoddy]

I'm sure they will take your thoughts on the matter and file them next to the opinions of the SJW then. Some will say it must be changed because of what it might mean. Others clearly say it shouldn't be changed.

Both sides are full of ****. The company needs to look out for its longterm interests, regardless of which side of the issue it ultimately falls on because clearly it's going to piss someone off.

It appears it pissed you off because someone doesn’t agree with a company being bullied by political correctness.
So one would have to assume your in favor of it.