OnlyFans is now banning sex content

[Glocktogo]

For the record, I'm not saying "It's okay when we do it", I'm more saying "Something I don't like did something I do like, so I won't pretend to be mad about it". We've had a mixed market in the United States for over a century now. Unless something were to happen that completely changed how this country runs that isn't changing. I'll take a victory for my personal morals given to me by a system I can't reasonably change.

To be fair, that's pretty weak sauce. But as I like to say, you do you.

 

[AguaFriaRanger]

To be fair, that's pretty weak sauce. But as I like to say, you do you.

What would you advise? That I sit around being mad all the time about how the fed looks nothing like what the founding fathers intended? That I go join some militia and get put on a watch list? I admire libertarian idealism, it is almost childlike in its passion and ignorance.

 

[AguaFriaRanger]

More news on this, apparently it isn't some excessive government crackdown but exactly what I was alluding to in my orignal post on the matter - too much illegal stuff being paid for on credit cards!

Live version

OnlyFans: How it handles illegal sex videos - BBC investigation

Archive version

https://archive.fo/d8RC2

Some Quotes:

Internal documents, leaked to BBC News, reveal that OnlyFans allows moderators to give multiple warnings to accounts that post illegal content on its online platform before deciding to close them. Described as a "compliance manual", the documents also show that staff are asked to be more lenient towards successful accounts on the British content-sharing service.

So yes if you post illegal content but are successful for the company they'll keep you around and give slaps on the wrist.

In May, BBC News revealed the site was failing to prevent under-18s from selling and appearing in explicit videos, despite it being illegal for children to do so. At the time, OnlyFans said attempts to use the site fraudulently were "rare".

Protection of minors failing and then there's more

Moderators have also told BBC news they have found prostitution services advertised, bestiality and material one moderator believed to be incest. The BBC has seen examples of some of this banned content. In one video, a man is seen eating faeces. In another, a man pays homeless people to have sex with him on camera.

From a moderator who went on record

He says he has found illegal and extreme content in videos - including bestiality involving dogs and the use of spy cams, guns, knives and drugs. Some material is not actively searched for by moderators as frequently as he believes it should be, says Christof, despite being banned under the platform's terms of service.

OnlyFans says moderators are given specific briefs and if they routinely go beyond them they will be "directed to focus only on their assigned type of content". Christof also says that despite being banned, the advertising of sex for sale is common among low earners on the site. Christof, and a second person who has moderated content for the site, say some creators offer competitions to meet and have sex with a fan, as a way of increasing tip payments

 

[killerpigeon]

Looks like I'm gonna have to find an honest living again

 

[SiGArmed]

Looks like I'm gonna have to find an honest living again

Nah they reversed the decision.

 

[TedKennedy]

Nah they reversed the decision.

Never been a customer, but good for them.

People want to pay to watch weird stuff, so be it. Technology is such that if some perv is posting actual child porn, it's not that hard to trace where it's coming from. Behead a few of those (perhaps another pay per view opportunity) and discourage that behavior.

 

[gerhard1]

Never heard of it.

Likewise.

 

[SoonerP226]

Never been a customer, but good for them.

People want to pay to watch weird stuff, so be it. Technology is such that if some perv is posting actual child porn, it's not that hard to trace where it's coming from. Behead a few of those (perhaps another pay per view opportunity) and discourage that behavior.

The coverage of it I heard in the tech press said they were banning "adult" content at the behest of their payment processors, but the bankers figured out that forcing them to get rid of the only thing they actually had to sell was not going to keep them in business. Apparently, the bankers are more interested in making money than virtue signaling.

 

[TedKennedy]

The coverage of it I heard in the tech press said they were banning "adult" content at the behest of their payment processors, but the bankers figured out that forcing them to get rid of the only thing they actually had to sell was not going to keep them in business. Apparently, the bankers are more interested in making money than virtue signaling.

I wonder if the "bankers" are connected in any way to the groups promoting communism and the rest of our social decline via media? That would be a big coincidence wouldn't it?