So you can't or wont explain it statistically, that's fine.
I can't help you if you don't understand/refuse to acknowledge what is and what isn't significant?
Tulsa area is pretty large, 61st and Garnett isn't convenient to the suburbs north, east, and west so the middle of town case doesn't hold weight unless you eliminate the votes from those outside of the immediate Tulsa area.
Tulsa is large? Um no. You can get anywhere in Tulsa in about 15-20mins.
OKC is even larger and in contrast it takes damn near 20-30 mins minimum for anything yet I'll BET you see a higher number than 10% in that poll. This has been my whole point all along.
You sure are gray for a hard core scientific/statistical background guy.
If you didn't understand the concepts I mentioned then certainly this would seem "gray" to you. I mean honestly you've resorted to all the classical remedial forms of argument here. You've got spin, red herring, and now ad hom. Do you have any substance? Or as someone pointed out earlier.... just TRYING to argue for the sake of doing so?