Well half the Buick deals are selling their franchise back to GM, Now Ford dealers refuse

[ConstitutionCowboy]

An EV is not zero emission. Instead of running on gasoline, they run on coal. Why is that so hard to understand for the liberals?

Oh, they understand - at least those who came up with the plan understand. It's all about agenda, and their power and position are the main components of that agenda - and money, too, no doubt.

Woody

 

[ttown]

They sure start a nice breech front bonfire to roast your weiner. Oh hell to the NO.

https://www.lakeexpo.com/boating/bo...cle_5cc90d04-e352-11eb-a109-07aadefbaa10.html
Danger Will Robinson. Talk about 2001 a Space Odyssey
Damn things possessed as it locks the doors for your safety.

https://www.autoblog.com/2023/11/16...t87G5dYRX1EMWFNE5k8AIacbhbHWC5YAEfgHSR9DOmzEB
Sounds like a major design flaw. Either the battery compartment isn’t waterproof or on a direct short causes the battery to overheats and explodes due to improper fusing IMO.

 

[Buddhaman]

An EV is not zero emission. Instead of running on gasoline, they run on coal. Why is that so hard to understand for the liberals?

Which is the major point they bring for EV: easier emissions control. Also, there are other sources of energy besides coal.

 

[dlbleak]

Imagine what the earth is going to look like after 50 years of strip mining for elements.

 

[bas402]

Do I smell another automaker bail out in the making?!?

Yes you do.

 

[Schlafftablett]

They can make all these stupid EVs but I still can’t get a freakin heated wheel in my truck.

 

[JoeUSooner]

So, you are saying that the push for electric vehicles is part of a larger government conspiracy theory?
Really?

A true skeptic, Harley? Or just playing devil's advocate?

The last 34 - count 'em, 34 is accurate! - publicly-claimed "conspiracy theories" have turned out to be absolutely correct. Every one of them. Look at the fact that every single anti-conservative "headline" published by CNN in the last nineteen - 19 - months, without exception, has been later retracted. Always on the 'back page,' and never acknowledged or referenced on the website's 'front page,' but retracted nonetheless. (I don't ask you to take my word... there are a number of places you can readily verify all this for yourself.)

I'd consider 34-0 to be a sufficiently strong 'overlay of the odds' to take to Vegas...

 

[Dorkus]

Which is the major point they bring for EV: easier emissions control. Also, there are other sources of energy besides coal.

Yes, natural gas which is a fossil fuel. Wind which is inefficient as heck and kills millions of birds each year. Plus the whales.

What else am I missing?

 

[JoeUSooner]

Which is the major point they bring for EV: easier emissions control. Also, there are other sources of energy besides coal.

 

[Buddhaman]

Yes, natural gas which is a fossil fuel. Wind which is inefficient as heck and kills millions of birds each year. Plus the whales.

What else am I missing?

Never knocked natural gas, just corrected that coal is not the only power source. We could do nuclear but nobody likes that option. I’ll stick with my gas and hybrid vehicles but I get sick of false statements from both sides over EVs.