Why natural gas from Putin's Russia has to be imported to New England

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

RugersGR8

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
32,763
Reaction score
56,261
Location
NW OK
“Keep It In the Ground”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...tins-russia-has-to-be-imported-to-new-england
Why natural gas from Putin's Russia has to be imported to New England
by Steve Everly | March 24, 2018 12:00 AM

..."Earlier this year, New England — located just a few hundred miles from the Marcellus Shale, one of the world’s largest natural gas fields — was forced to import a cargo of Russian liquefied natural gas. This was necessary because anti-energy activists have convinced local elected leaders to block new energy infrastructure, including pipelines that could bring American gas to the region. This is making households in the Northeast more dependent on imported energy, and forcing them to pay among the highest energy bills in the country."...
 

dennishoddy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
84,915
Reaction score
62,746
Location
Ponca City Ok
“Keep It In the Ground”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...tins-russia-has-to-be-imported-to-new-england
Why natural gas from Putin's Russia has to be imported to New England
by Steve Everly | March 24, 2018 12:00 AM

..."Earlier this year, New England — located just a few hundred miles from the Marcellus Shale, one of the world’s largest natural gas fields — was forced to import a cargo of Russian liquefied natural gas. This was necessary because anti-energy activists have convinced local elected leaders to block new energy infrastructure, including pipelines that could bring American gas to the region. This is making households in the Northeast more dependent on imported energy, and forcing them to pay among the highest energy bills in the country."...

"while the state’s attorney general thinks Russian LNG is better for the climate than piping in American fuel."
The idiots of the global warming rear their ugly heads again.
So, a country with less epa or pollution restrictions than the US has can produce the gas, and transport it how many thousands of miles via ship and save the planet??? Are you shitting me?
 

Poke78

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Messages
2,804
Reaction score
1,066
Location
Sand Springs
The goofiest part of this is that our esteemed Congresscritters screwed us royally years ago with the Jones Act, the requirement that all goods moving from one US port to another had to be on a US-flagged vessel. Due to multiple reasons, most having to do with crew costs and liability, there is no such thing as a US-flagged LNG vessel that could get a load in Houston and take it to Boston. Throw in the decisions by the other political critters described in the article and you'd begin to think the shoe is on the wrong foot since these people are supposed to working for those who elected them. But that's tin-foil hat crazy thinking, right???
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom