Why Romney will be more dangerous that Obama

[WhiteyMacD]

The Supreme Court Ruling on ObamaCare does not matter. It will make little difference to America in the short run, and no difference in the long run.

Why? Because almost all elected Republicans and Democrats are Big Government politicians – in all things – including health care. After this Supreme Court decision, they will get back to work expanding government involvement in all things – especially health care.

One thing could make things worse. Electing Republican Mitt Romney President.

Why?

Republicans fiercely oppose, and often defeat Democratic Party attempts to massively expand government involvement in Health Care – such as HillaryCare.

But Democrats usually vote for Republican Party legislation to massively expand government’s role in Health Care.

Republican President George Bush’s $1.1 Trillion Government Prescription Drug Program was voted into law by Republicans and Democrats.

Republican Governor Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts state government expansion into Massachusetts health care – RomneyCare – was voted into law by both Republicans and Democrats. With virtually no resistance.

A Republican-controlled House of Representatives and US Senate would oppose Democratic President Barack Obama’s health care proposals.

But a Republican majority House of Representatives and US Senate would support and vote for a Republican President Mitt Romney’s Big Government health care proposals. And most Democrats in the House and Senate would, too.

What Republican Governor Romney did to Massachusetts’ health care, a Republican President Romney would do to America’s health care.

A President Mitt Romney would not undo ObamaCare. He’ll make it permanent.

A first-term President Mitt Romney would be far more dangerous to small business, the private sector, and taxpayers than a lame-duck President Obama – no matter what the Supreme Court decided.


DISCUSS

 

[jrusling]

In general I agree with you. If it were not for the Supreme Court appointments, I would be tempted to vote that way. Not that I trust who Romney would appoint, but I suspect they would be a better choice than those that President Obama would appoint.

It is unfortunate that you cannot trust any of the governments, especially the national one.

 

[sanjuro893]

So who in the hell do we vote for???

 

[farmerbyron]

The Supreme Court Ruling on ObamaCare does not matter. It will make little difference to America in the short run, and no difference in the long run.

Why? Because almost all elected Republicans and Democrats are Big Government politicians – in all things – including health care. After this Supreme Court decision, they will get back to work expanding government involvement in all things – especially health care.

One thing could make things worse. Electing Republican Mitt Romney President.

Why?

Republicans fiercely oppose, and often defeat Democratic Party attempts to massively expand government involvement in Health Care – such as HillaryCare.

But Democrats usually vote for Republican Party legislation to massively expand government’s role in Health Care.

Republican President George Bush’s $1.1 Trillion Government Prescription Drug Program was voted into law by Republicans and Democrats.

Republican Governor Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts state government expansion into Massachusetts health care – RomneyCare – was voted into law by both Republicans and Democrats. With virtually no resistance.

A Republican-controlled House of Representatives and US Senate would oppose Democratic President Barack Obama’s health care proposals.

But a Republican majority House of Representatives and US Senate would support and vote for a Republican President Mitt Romney’s Big Government health care proposals. And most Democrats in the House and Senate would, too.

What Republican Governor Romney did to Massachusetts’ health care, a Republican President Romney would do to America’s health care.

A President Mitt Romney would not undo ObamaCare. He’ll make it permanent.

A first-term President Mitt Romney would be far more dangerous to small business, the private sector, and taxpayers than a lame-duck President Obama – no matter what the Supreme Court decided.

DISCUSS

I've been expressing this opinion to my family for quite some time. Unfortunately, it seems to fall on deaf ears.

 

[LightningCrash]

So who in the hell do we vote for???

None of the above.

 

[338Shooter]

RuPaul.

 

[Trashboat]

You may not like Romney but he is the only choice. If Obama wins our way of life as we have known it is over.

 

[Clay]

our way of life as we have known it is over.

Thats going to happen either way, they are all in this together.

 

[Glocktogo]

In general I agree with you. If it were not for the Supreme Court appointments, I would be tempted to vote that way. Not that I trust who Romney would appoint, but I suspect they would be a better choice than those that President Obama would appoint.

It is unfortunate that you cannot trust any of the governments, especially the national one.

Actually, Romney will appoint moderate to liberal (by our Oklahoma conservative standards) nominees to SCOTUS. They'll get a rubber stamp by both sides of the aisle. Obama will nominate leftist appointees. A republican majority will fight those nominees. Not because they don't want to expand federal control over the people, but because fighting the Dems puts money in their reelection coffers.

So who in the hell do we vote for???

Gary Johnson (or no one).

You may not like Romney but he is the only choice. If Obama wins our way of life as we have known it is over.

You have no evidence to support that premise. You also have no evidence to support the ppremise that Romney WON'T spell an end to our way of life as we know it.

 

[LightningCrash]

You may not like Romney but he is the only choice. If Obama wins our way of life as we have known it is over.