Federal appeals court rules that drug users can not be barred from owning guns.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

dieseltech09

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Messages
4,051
Reaction score
231
Location
Yukon, Oklahoma, United States
https://www.reuters.com/legal/drug-user-cannot-be-barred-owning-guns-us-court-rules-2023-08-10/
Aug 9 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled that a decades-old law prohibiting users of illegal drugs from owning firearms was unconstitutional as applied to the case of a marijuana user, the latest fallout from a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year that expanded gun rights.

A three-judge panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the federal law violated a Mississippi man's right to "keep and bear arms" under the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment.

The man, Patrick Daniels, had been convicted under that law after law enforcement found a pistol and a semi-automatic rifle in his vehicle during a traffic stop along with marijuana cigarette butts.

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration did not administer a drug test, though Daniels admitted he sometimes smoked marijuana, which federal law prohibits. He was sentenced to nearly four years in prison.

While his case was pending, the conservative-majority Supreme Court in June 2022 declared for the first time that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to carry a handgun in public for self-defense.

That decision, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, also announced a new test for assessing firearms laws, saying restrictions must be "consistent with this nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation."

U.S. Circuit Judge Jerry Smith, an appointee of former Republican President Ronald Reagan, said that decision meant the statute was invalid as applied to Daniels.

"In short, our history and tradition may support some limits on an intoxicated person’s right to carry a weapon, but it does not justify disarming a sober citizen based exclusively on his past drug usage," he wrote.

U.S. Circuit Judge Stephen Higginson, an appointee of former Democratic President Barack Obama, in a concurring opinion agreed while noting that many other gun safety laws had likewise been struck down since the Supreme Court's ruling.

He urged the court to provide more guidance in a case it agreed to hear in its next term, saying last year's ruling could otherwise result in the "dismantling of the laws that have served to protect our country for generations."
 

Old Noob

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jan 1, 2023
Messages
783
Reaction score
2,881
Location
Okmulgee County, OK.
No, I don't use old Mary Jane. But I feel this is a good decision and a step in the right direction. A man's right to defend himself should not be taken away for much of anything in my eyes.
I also do understand that some of y'all may not feel the same way I do about this subject.
 

HoLeChit

Here for Frens
Special Hen
Joined
Sep 26, 2014
Messages
6,532
Reaction score
10,499
Location
None
No, I don't use old Mary Jane. But I feel this is a good decision and a step in the right direction. A man's right to defend himself should not be taken away for much of anything in my eyes.
I also do understand that some of y'all may not feel the same way I do about this subject.
I think you hit the nail on the head.

Should be interesting when the anti devils lettuce crowd gets in here.....
 

Letfreedomring

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 21, 2022
Messages
2,396
Reaction score
6,399
Location
74053
ZomboMeme 4604.jpg
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom