State Questions

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Okie4570

Sharpshooter
Staff Member
Special Hen Moderator Moderator
Joined
Nov 28, 2010
Messages
23,025
Reaction score
25,028
Location
NWOK

This. Walking out of Walmart with some bags and something too big,

Greeter: "may I see your receipt sir"
Me: no thanks
Greeter: but I need to see your receipt.
Me: no, this is mine. I do not need to prove to you it's mine. If you are accusing me of stealing it, call the police. Have a nice day.
Greeter: blank stare

We must have some how been raised in the same home?????????? lol, my response almost word for word.

Really? I've never been asked for a receipt at Walmart by a greeter.

I have multiple times over the years.
 

Foghorn

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
854
Reaction score
176
Location
OKC
Gonna have to vote no on 780. I agree there needs to be reform, but this is not going to have the intended outcome.
Haven't put much thought yet into the others. Guess I need to start reading up on them pretty soon

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk
 

OKC03Cobra

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
1,261
Reaction score
1,002
Location
Norman
I think we've(probably) already decided who we are going to vote for in local and national elections, but what about the several important state questions coming on the ballot?

Ballotpedia Article

State Questions(official website)

State Questions in plain English(slideshow)

How do you guys feel about these questions?


I'll probably say No to the death penalty, No to the agriculture. I'm not sure about SQ 779. It does make sure that none of the money raised goes to superintendents or such, but a one percent hike on the sales tax is pretty huge. especially if you live in OKC where the sales tax rate is already like ~8-9%.

I'll probably vote yes on 780 and 781, to help lower the nonviolent offenders in Oklahoma jails. Yes on 792 and no 790.


I also recommend you check the ratings of people running for office in Oklahoma with the NRA here:
https://www.nrapvf.org/grades/oklahoma/

Yes to death penalty, Yes to agriculture, No to tax increase, No to law enforcement reclass, No to law enforcement fund, Yes to religion repeal, No to alcohol grocery.
 

ConstitutionCowboy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
6,289
Reaction score
5,190
Location
Kingfisher County
Laws in effect prior to 2015 will not be affected. Future laws will require the state to show a very important state interest to be able to further restrict or regulate agriculture. The question will be any laws passed after 2014 and before 779 would take effect. I think it is worth noting that much of the funding combatting 779 comes from the same interest that would also like to restrict your hunting.

What is a "very important state interest" I must ask. Because there are no parameters, limitations, or any specifics at all in the amendment, the "very important state interest" can be anything the state legislature desires. It is a grab for power, plain and simple. It has nothing to do with securing a right and everything to do with expanding state powers.

Limitations upon hunting is a whole other matter and irrelevant to this issue.

Woody
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom